Stringer v. Social Security Administration
| David Stringer |
| Social Security Administration |
| 4:2021cv00464 |
| October 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Susan E Huntsman |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed re: Social Security Administration Served Atty General 11/4/21 (Re: #2 Social Security Complaint ) by David Stringer (With attachments) (Parmele, Daniel) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed re: Social Security Administration Served Office of Regional Counsel 11/1/21 (Re: #2 Social Security Complaint ) by David Stringer (With attachments) (Parmele, Daniel) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed re: Social Security Administration Served US Atty 11/1/21 (Re: #2 Social Security Complaint ) by David Stringer (With attachments) (Parmele, Daniel) |
Filing 9
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Susan E Huntsman (Re: #8 Appearance - Attorney, #2 Social Security Complaint ) (kah, Chambers)
|
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Nolan Fields on behalf of Social Security Administration [Note: Attorney Nolan Fields added to party Social Security Administration(pty:dft).] (Fields, Nolan) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Issued by Court Clerk as to Social Security Administration (lmt, Dpty Clk) |
|
Filing 6
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Susan E Huntsman ; granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; granting #5 Motion to Waive (Re: #5 MOTION to Waive Requirement of Association of Local Counsel, #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis ) (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (dlg, Dpty Clk)
|
| ***Remark: 3 summons in hold tray (blc, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Waive Requirement of Association of Local Counsel by David Stringer (Parmele, Daniel) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Daniel A Parmele on behalf of David Stringer (Parmele, Daniel) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by David Stringer (Parmele, Daniel) |
| Filing 2 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration by David Stringer (Parmele, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by David Stringer [Note: Attorney Daniel A Parmele added to party David Stringer(pty:pla).] (Parmele, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stringer v. Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: David Stringer | |
| Represented By: | Daniel Parmele |
| Represented By: | Daniel A Parmele |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Nolan Fields |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
