Perry v. Crow
Elston Craig Perry |
Scott Crow |
4:2021cv00511 |
November 30, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
Claire V Eagan |
Christine D Little |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion (Re: #8 MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus as Time-Barred by the Statute of Limitations ) by Elston Craig Perry ; (ll, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 10 ERRATA/CORRECTION (Re: #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ) by Elston Craig Perry (ll, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 9 BRIEF in Support of Motion (Re: #8 MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus as Time-Barred by the Statute of Limitations ) by Scott Crow ; (With attachments) (Hunt, Caroline) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus as Time-Barred by the Statute of Limitations by Scott Crow (Hunt, Caroline) |
Filing 7 LETTER from Petitioner by Elston Craig Perry (ll, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Caroline Elizabeth Jane Hunt on behalf of Scott Crow [Note: Attorney Caroline Elizabeth Jane Hunt added to party Scott Crow(pty:res).] (Hunt, Caroline) |
Filing 5 ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan - Directing Court of Court to Send, electronically, the petition #1 and this order to the Office of the Attorney General for the State of Oklahoma. Setting Answer/Response deadlines as follows:, setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Responses due by 1/7/2022, Replies due by 2/7/2022), directing court clerk to take action (Re: #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ) (RGG, Chambers) |
***Remark: per dkt #5 a copy of order and Petition (dkt #1) sent to the Office of the Attorney General for the State of Oklahoma at fhc.docket@aog.ok.gov (Re: #5 Order,, Setting/Resetting Deadline(s)/Hearing(s),, Directing Court Clerk to Take Action,,, ) (lmt, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 4 FILING FEES Paid in Full (lmt, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk Due to the inclusion of personal identifiers and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(e)(2), the Court hereby, for good cause, restricts remote electronic access to Document 2 to registered case participants. If a future filing in this case contains personal identifiers, the Court may impose the same restrictions on said filing pursuant to this order. (blc, Dpty Clk). Modified on 12/1/2021 to include additional language(blc, Dpty Clk). |
Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 2254 against Scott Crow by Elston Craig Perry (blc, Dpty Clk) Modified to correct event on 12/1/2021 (blc, Dpty Clk). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Perry v. Crow | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Elston Craig Perry | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Scott Crow | |
Represented By: | Caroline Elizabeth Jane Hunt |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.