Allen v. Crow
Petitioner: Nathan V. Allen and Nathan V Allen
Respondent: Scott Crow
Case Number: 4:2021cv00527
Filed: December 8, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Claire V Eagan
Referring Judge: Susan E Huntsman
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan , directing Respondent to show cause why the writ should not issue and file a response to the petition( Responses due by 3/4/2022, Replies due by 4/4/2022) (Re: #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 ) (lmc, Chambers)
February 2, 2022 Opinion or Order ***Remark: per dkt #6 petition (dkt #1) and order (dkt #6) forwarded to the Office of the Attorney General for the State of Oklahoma at fhc.docket@oag.ok.gov (Re: #6 Order,, Directing Respondent to Show Cause re: PWHC, ) (lmt, Dpty Clk)
January 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 FILING FEES Paid in Full (lmt, Dpty Clk)
January 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan ; setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Filing Fee due by 2/14/2022); denying #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (lmc, Chambers)
January 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Nathan V Allen (ll, Dpty Clk)
December 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan - No later than 30 days after the entry of this order, or on or before January 18, 2022, Allen shall either pay the $5 filing fee, submit a properly supported motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, or show cause in writing for his failure to do so. The Clerk of Court shall send to Allen a blank motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (form AO-240), identified for Case No. 21-CV-0527-CVE-SH., setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Filing Fee due by 1/18/2022), directing court clerk to take action (Re: #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 ) (RGG, Chambers)
December 16, 2021 Opinion or Order ***Remark: per Dkt#2 , one blank motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (form AO-240) marked with case no. 21-cv-527-CVE-SH forwarded to Nathan Allen at 6833 E 133rd Rd Holdenville, OK 74848 (Re: #2 Order,,, Setting/Resetting Deadline(s)/Hearing(s),,, Directing Court Clerk to Take Action,,,,, ) (ll, Dpty Clk)
December 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 by Nathan V. Allen (blc, Dpty Clk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Allen v. Crow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Nathan V. Allen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Nathan V Allen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Scott Crow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?