Delaney v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
| Michael Delaney |
| City of Tulsa, Oklahoma and Aaron Russell |
| 4:2021cv00544 |
| December 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| John F Heil |
| Susan E Huntsman |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed re: City of Tulsa, Oklahoma (Re: #2 Complaint ) by Michael Delaney (Smolen, Daniel) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER with Jury Demand (Re: #2 Complaint ) by City of Tulsa, Oklahoma (Vaughn, R) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by R Lawson Vaughn, III on behalf of City of Tulsa, Oklahoma [Note: Attorney R Lawson Vaughn, III added to party City of Tulsa, Oklahoma(pty:dft).] (Vaughn, R) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Terri Michelle McGrew on behalf of City of Tulsa, Oklahoma [Note: Attorney Terri Michelle McGrew added to party City of Tulsa, Oklahoma(pty:dft).] (McGrew, Terri) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued by Court Clerk as to All Defendants (lmt, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, Aaron Russell (paid $402 filing fee; receipt number AOKNDC-2530803) by Michael Delaney (Smolen, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Michael Delaney (Smolen, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
