Van Scoyoc et al v. LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Inc.
| Susan Van Scoyoc and Stephen Van Scoyoc |
| LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Inc. |
| 4:2021cv00563 |
| December 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Terence Kern |
| Christine D Little |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER by Judge Terence Kern - Consent Motion for Extension of Time for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint (Doc. 9) is granted. Response due on or before 3/1/2022 ; granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (lmc, Chambers)
|
| Filing 11 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (identifying: Corporate Parent RELX Inc., Corporate Parent RELX PLC, Corporate Parent RELX Group plc, Corporate Parent RELX US Holdings Inc., Corporate Parent LexisNexis Risk Holdings Inc., Corporate Parent LexisNexis Risk Assets Inc. for LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Inc.) by LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Inc. (Hardin, Mark) |
| Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , directing LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Inc. to file a Corporate Disclosure Statement pursuant to FRCvP 7.1 within seven (7) days of this order, if they have not already done so. The parties shall use the form entitled Corporate Disclosure Statement available on the Courts website (please do not refile if already filed on non-court form unless directed to do so). If you have already filed your Corporate Disclosure Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Corporate Disclosure Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (bjb, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 9 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer Plaintiff's Complaint (Re: #2 Complaint ) by LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Inc. (Hardin, Mark) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Mark Edward Hardin on behalf of LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Inc. [Note: Attorney Mark Edward Hardin added to party LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Inc.(pty:dft).] (Hardin, Mark) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Mary Kathleen Rawls on behalf of All Plaintiffs [Note: Attorney Mary Kathleen Rawls added to party Stephen Van Scoyoc(pty:pla), Attorney Mary Kathleen Rawls added to party Susan Van Scoyoc(pty:pla).] (Rawls, Mary) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Minal Gahlot on behalf of All Plaintiffs [Note: Attorney Minal Gahlot added to party Stephen Van Scoyoc(pty:pla), Attorney Minal Gahlot added to party Susan Van Scoyoc(pty:pla).] (Gahlot, Minal) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued by Court Clerk as to LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Inc. (lmt, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 4 LETTER re: Local Counsel Requirement sent to David Michael Marco (bjb, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Larry Paul Smith on behalf of Stephen Van Scoyoc, Susan Van Scoyoc [Note: Attorney Larry Paul Smith added to party Stephen Van Scoyoc(pty:pla), Attorney Larry Paul Smith added to party Susan Van Scoyoc(pty:pla).] (Smith, Larry) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Inc. (paid $402 filing fee; receipt number AOKNDC-2535841) by Susan Van Scoyoc, Stephen Van Scoyoc (Marco, David) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Stephen Van Scoyoc, Susan Van Scoyoc (Marco, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
