Boggs v. Armstrong Relocation Co.
| Leah M Boggs |
| Armstrong Relocation Co. |
| 4:2022cv00020 |
| January 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Susan E Huntsman |
| Terence Kern |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (identifying: Corporate Parent Armstrong Relocation & Companies, LLC for Armstrong Relocation Co.) by Armstrong Relocation Co. (Bruce, Philip) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , directing Armstrong Relocation Co. to file a Corporate Disclosure Statement pursuant to FRCvP 7.1 within seven (7) days of this order, if they have not already done so. The parties shall use the form entitled Corporate Disclosure Statement available on the Courts website (please do not refile if already filed on non-court form unless directed to do so). If you have already filed your Corporate Disclosure Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Corporate Disclosure Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (blc, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 7
MINUTE ORDER by Judge Terence Kern - Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond (Doc. 6) until 3/16/2022 is granted. ; granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (lmc, Chambers)
|
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer (Re: #2 Complaint ) by Armstrong Relocation Co. (Bruce, Philip) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Philip Richard Bruce on behalf of Armstrong Relocation Co. [Note: Attorney Philip Richard Bruce added to party Armstrong Relocation Co.(pty:dft).] (Bruce, Philip) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed re: Armstrong Relocation Co. (Re: #2 Complaint ) by Leah M Boggs (Vaught, Jessica) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued by Court Clerk as to Armstrong Relocation Co. (ll, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants (paid $402 filing fee; receipt number AOKNDC-2544399) by Leah M Boggs (Vaught, Jessica) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Leah M Boggs (Vaught, Jessica) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Boggs v. Armstrong Relocation Co. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Leah M Boggs | |
| Represented By: | Charles C Vaught |
| Represented By: | Jessica Nicole Vaught |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Armstrong Relocation Co. | |
| Represented By: | Philip Richard Bruce |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
