Aggarwal v. Conduent Card Services, LLC et al
| Vishal Aggarwal |
| Conduent Card Services, LLC, Comercia Bank, Comerica Inc, Comerica Management Company, Inc, Chime Financial, Inc. and Midfirst Bank |
| 4:2022cv00050 |
| January 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Claire V Eagan |
| Jodi F Jayne |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , : Due to the inclusion of personal identifiers and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(e)(2), the Court hereby, for good cause, restricts remote electronic access to Document #1 to registered case participants. If a future filing in this case contains personal identifiers, the Court may impose the same restrictions on said filing pursuant to this order. (Re: #1 Complaint ) (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (bjb, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 2 FILING FEES Paid in Full by Vishal Aggarwal (bjb, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants by Vishal Aggarwal (bjb, Dpty Clk) Modified on 1/28/2022 to restrict PDF, as directed by the Court and per Minute Order # 3 (bjb, Dpty Clk). (Main Document 1 replaced on 1/28/2022: rotated page 32) (bjb, Dpty Clk). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
