Valdez v. Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc.
Jose Portillo Valdez |
Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc. doing business as Carmax #2 |
4:2022cv00143 |
March 29, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
John F Heil |
Christine D Little |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 10 JOINT STATUS REPORT by Jose Portillo Valdez (Catalano, Paul) |
![]() |
Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (identifying: Corporate Parent CarMax, Inc. for Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc.) by Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc. (Holloway, Lorinda) |
Filing 7 ANSWER (Re: State Court Petition/Complaint ) by Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc. (Holloway, Lorinda) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Paul Mario Catalano on behalf of Jose Portillo Valdez [Note: Attorney Paul Mario Catalano added to party Jose Portillo Valdez(pty:pla).] (Catalano, Paul) |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Lucius James Wallace on behalf of Jose Portillo Valdez [Note: Attorney Lucius James Wallace added to party Jose Portillo Valdez(pty:pla).] (Wallace, Lucius) |
Filing 4 LETTER re: Local Counsel Requirement sent to Lorinda G Holloway (ll, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , directing Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc. to file a Corporate Disclosure Statement pursuant to FRCvP 7.1 within seven (7) days of this order, if they have not already done so. The parties shall use the form entitled Corporate Disclosure Statement available on the Courts website (please do not refile if already filed on non-court form unless directed to do so). If you have already filed your Corporate Disclosure Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Corporate Disclosure Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (ll, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Removal with Jury Demand from District Court for Tulsa County, Oklahoma, case number CJ-2022-00690 (paid $402 filing fee; receipt number AOKNDC-2586048) by Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc. (With attachments) (Holloway, Lorinda) |
Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc. (Holloway, Lorinda) |
PETITION/COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed in State Court against Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc. by Jose Portillo Valdez (ll, Dpty Clk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Valdez v. Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jose Portillo Valdez | |
Represented By: | Robert David Humphreys |
Represented By: | Lucius James Wallace |
Represented By: | Paul Mario Catalano |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc. doing business as Carmax #2 | |
Represented By: | Lorinda G Holloway |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.