AREIT Yale Village LLC v. Nabholz Construction Corporation
| AREIT Yale Village LLC |
| Nabholz Construction Corporation |
| 4:2022cv00158 |
| April 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Gregory K Frizzell |
| Christine D Little |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Second AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants (Re: #8 Amended Complaint ) by AREIT Yale Village LLC (With attachments) (Hughes, Kayci) |
Filing 9
ORDER by Judge Gregory K Frizzell directing plaintiff to file a Second Amended Complaint by 4/29/2022. (Re: #8 Amended Complaint, #2 Complaint ) (lah, Chambers)
|
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants (Re: #2 Complaint ) by AREIT Yale Village LLC (With attachments) (Hughes, Kayci) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to Order to Show Cause (Re: #5 Order, Directing Party to Show Cause ) by AREIT Yale Village LLC (Hughes, Kayci) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , directing AREIT Yale Village LLC to file a Corporate Disclosure Statement pursuant to FRCvP 7.1 within seven (7) days of this order, if they have not already done so. The parties shall use the form entitled Corporate Disclosure Statement available on the Courts website (please do not refile if already filed on non-court form unless directed to do so). If you have already filed your Corporate Disclosure Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Corporate Disclosure Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (blc, Dpty Clk) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER by Judge Gregory K Frizzell , directing plaintiff to show cause( Response to Order to Show Cause due by 4/21/2022) (lah, Chambers)
|
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (identifying: Corporate Parent AREIT Yale Village LLC for AREIT Yale Village LLC) by AREIT Yale Village LLC (Hughes, Kayci) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Kayci Bair Hughes on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Hughes, Kayci) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants (paid $402 filing fee; receipt number AOKNDC-2591493) by AREIT Yale Village LLC (With attachments) (Hughes, Kayci) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by AREIT Yale Village LLC (Hughes, Kayci) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: AREIT Yale Village LLC v. Nabholz Construction Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: AREIT Yale Village LLC | |
| Represented By: | Kayci Bair Hughes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nabholz Construction Corporation | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
