Lutheran Church of the Good Shepherd v. Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company
Lutheran Church of the Good Shepherd |
Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company |
4:2022cv00223 |
May 23, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
Claire V Eagan |
Susan E Huntsman |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan (INITIAL), setting/resetting scheduling order date(s): ( Discovery due by 3/27/2023, Dispositive Motions due by 5/1/2023, Proposed Pretrial Order due by 6/20/2023, Pretrial Conference set for 6/26/2023 at 10:00 AM before Judge Claire V Eagan, Jury Trial set for 7/17/2023 at 09:15 AM before Judge Claire V Eagan) (RGG, Chambers) |
Filing 24 JOINT STATUS REPORT by Lutheran Church of the Good Shepherd (Jones, William) |
Filing 23 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Janie Rios on behalf of Lutheran Church of the Good Shepherd [Note: Attorney Janie Rios added to party Lutheran Church of the Good Shepherd(pty:pla).] (Rios, Janie) |
Filing 22 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by William Truman Jones, Jr on behalf of Lutheran Church of the Good Shepherd [Note: Attorney William Truman Jones, Jr added to party Lutheran Church of the Good Shepherd(pty:pla).] (Jones, William) |
Filing 21 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Robert Green on behalf of Lutheran Church of the Good Shepherd [Note: Attorney Robert Green added to party Lutheran Church of the Good Shepherd(pty:pla).] (Green, Robert) |
Filing 20 ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan that Janie Rios is admitted pro hac vice for the limited purpose of representing plaintiff in the above-captioned matter. Counsel is directed to file a separate entry of appearance forthwith. ; granting #19 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice (RGG, Chambers) |
Filing 19 MOTION for Attorney(s) Janie Rios to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $50 PHV fee; receipt number AOKNDC-2627885) by Lutheran Church of the Good Shepherd (With attachments) (McIntyre, Noble) |
Filing 18 ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan - The motions [16, 17] are granted. Robert D. Green and William T. Jones, Jr. are admitted pro hac vice for the limited purpose of representing plaintiff in the above-captioned matter. Counsel are directed to file separate entries of appearance forthwith. ; granting #16 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice; granting #17 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice (RGG, Chambers) |
Filing 17 MOTION for Attorney(s) William T. Jones, Jr. to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $50 PHV fee; receipt number AOKNDC-2624976) by Lutheran Church of the Good Shepherd (With attachments) (McIntyre, Noble) |
Filing 16 MOTION for Attorney(s) Robert D. Green to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $50 PHV fee; receipt number AOKNDC-2624974) by Lutheran Church of the Good Shepherd (With attachments) (McIntyre, Noble) |
Filing 15 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Lutheran Church of the Good Shepherd (McIntyre, Noble) |
Filing 14 JURY DEMAND by Lutheran Church of the Good Shepherd (McIntyre, Noble) |
Filing 13 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Jeremy A Thurman on behalf of Lutheran Church of the Good Shepherd [Note: Attorney Jeremy A Thurman added to party Lutheran Church of the Good Shepherd(pty:pla).] (Thurman, Jeremy) |
Filing 12 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Noble McIntyre on behalf of Lutheran Church of the Good Shepherd (McIntyre, Noble) |
Filing 11 ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan , directing parties to file joint status report ( Status Report due by 6/27/2022) (RGG, Chambers) |
Filing 10 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by William Walton Whitehurst on behalf of Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company (Whitehurst, William) |
Filing 9 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Jeffrey Dillon Scott on behalf of Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company (Scott, Jeffrey) |
Filing 8 ANSWER (Re: State Court Petition/Complaint ) by Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company (Brewer, Michael) |
Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , directing Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company to file a Corporate Disclosure Statement pursuant to FRCvP 7.1 within seven (7) days of this order, if they have not already done so. The parties shall use the form entitled Corporate Disclosure Statement available on the Courts website (please do not refile if already filed on non-court form unless directed to do so). If you have already filed your Corporate Disclosure Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Corporate Disclosure Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (blc, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 6 NOTICE Notice of Filing Notice of Removal by Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company (With attachments) (Brewer, Michael) |
Filing 5 JURY DEMAND by Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company (Brewer, Michael) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company (Brewer, Michael) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Michael Wayne Brewer on behalf of Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company (Brewer, Michael) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Removal with Jury Demand from District Court of Tulsa County, case number CJ-2022-1162 (paid $402 filing fee; receipt number AOKNDC-2615365) by Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company (With attachments) (Brewer, Michael) |
Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company (Brewer, Michael) |
PETITION/COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed in State Court against Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company by Lutheran Church of the Good Shepherd (blc, Dpty Clk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.