Mitchell v. Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Gwen Smith Mitchell
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 4:2022cv00297
Filed: July 12, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Jodi F Jayne
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Rachel Dawn Parrilli on behalf of Social Security Administration [Note: Attorney Rachel Dawn Parrilli added to party Social Security Administration(pty:dft).] (Parrilli, Rachel)
August 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed re: Social Security Administration Served Office of Regional Counsel 7/26/22 (Re: #2 Social Security Complaint ) by Gwen Smith Mitchell (With attachments) (Parmele, Daniel)
August 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed re: Social Security Administration Served Office of Regional Counsel 7/26/22 (Re: #2 Social Security Complaint ) by Gwen Smith Mitchell (With attachments) (Parmele, Daniel)
August 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed re: Social Security Administration Served US Attorney 7/25/22 (Re: #2 Social Security Complaint ) by Gwen Smith Mitchell (With attachments) (Parmele, Daniel)
July 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SUMMONS Issued by Court Clerk as to Social Security Administration (blc, Dpty Clk)
July 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jodi F Jayne ; granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; granting #6 Motion to Waive (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (kah, Chambers)
July 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION to Waive Requirement of Association of Local Counsel by Gwen Smith Mitchell (Parmele, Daniel)
July 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 STATEMENT Consenting to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction by Gwen Smith Mitchell (Parmele, Daniel)
July 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Daniel A Parmele on behalf of Gwen Smith Mitchell (Parmele, Daniel)
July 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Gwen Smith Mitchell (Parmele, Daniel)
July 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration by Gwen Smith Mitchell (Parmele, Daniel)
July 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Gwen Smith Mitchell (Parmele, Daniel)
July 12, 2022 Opinion or Order ***Remark: 3 summons in hold tray (lmt, Dpty Clk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mitchell v. Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gwen Smith Mitchell
Represented By: Daniel A Parmele
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Rachel Dawn Parrilli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?