Wright v. Doe et al
Plaintiff: Jon Q Wright
Defendant: Jane Doe and Does 1-10
Case Number: 4:2022cv00300
Filed: July 12, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: John F Heil
Referring Judge: Jodi F Jayne
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ***Remark: Case filed in USDC SD/CA on 08/16/22 as case # 3:22-cv-01195 (sc, Dpty Clk)
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 REPORT on Copyrights/Patents/Trademarks (srt, Dpty Clk)
August 11, 2022 Opinion or Order ***Civil Case Terminated (see document number #14 ) (srt, Dpty Clk)
August 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge John F Heil, III Plaintiff's Motion to Transfer the Case and to Extend TRO is granted in part and denied in part ; transferring case (terminates case) ; granting in part and denying in part #13 Motion to Transfer Case to Other District (Documents Terminated: #13 MOTION to Transfer Case to Other District and to Extend the Temporary Restraining Order ) (JFH1, Chambers)
August 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MOTION to Transfer Case to Other District and to Extend the Temporary Restraining Order by Jon Q Wright (With attachments) (Lapin, Dmitry)
July 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MINUTES of Proceedings - held before Chief Judge John F Heil, III: Motion Hearing held on 7/28/2022 , striking/terminating deadline(s)/Hearing(s) (Re: #10 Supplemental MOTION for Preliminary Injunction or alternatively, to extend the Temporary Restraining Order ) (Court Reporter: Terri Beeler) (alg, Dpty Clk)
July 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge John F Heil, III Defendant's Motion for Preliminary Injunction or in the alternative to Extend the Temporary Restraining Order #7 is granted in part and denied in part ; granting in part and denying in part #10 Motion for Preliminary Injunction (JFH1, Chambers)
July 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Supplemental MOTION for Preliminary Injunction or alternatively, to extend the Temporary Restraining Order by Jon Q Wright (Lapin, Dmitry)
July 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER by Chief Judge John F Heil, III granting Plaintiffs Motion to Appear Telephonically [Dkt. No. 8] at the hearing on Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction, set for July 28, 2022 at 2:00 p.m. The Court is not inclined to hear evidence on Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction telephonically. However, the Court will invite counsel to present authority as to whether jurisdiction remains with this Court and whether the Temporary Restraining Order entered July 15, 2022 [Dkt. No. 7], should be extended for good cause. ; granting #8 Motion for Leave to Appear (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (JFH1, Chambers)
July 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Telephonically by Jon Q Wright (Lapin, Dmitry)
July 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge John F Heil, III Plaintiff's Motion for Ex Parte Temporary Restraining Order is granted in part and denied in part ; setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Motion Hearing set for 7/28/2022 at 02:00 PM before Chief Judge John F Heil III); granting in part and denying in part #3 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (Re: #3 Ex Parte MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order ) (JFH1, Chambers)
July 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 REPORT ON THE FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION OR APPEAL REGARDING A COPYRIGHT (AO-121) by Jon Q Wright (Lapin, Dmitry)
July 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER by Chief Judge John F Heil, III Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed Without Local Counsel is granted ; granting #4 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (JFH1, Chambers)
July 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION for leave to appear without local counsel by Jon Q Wright (Lapin, Dmitry)
July 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Ex Parte MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Jon Q Wright (With attachments) (Lapin, Dmitry)
July 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Jane Doe, Does 1-10 (paid $402 filing fee; receipt number AOKNDC-2641304) by Jon Q Wright (With attachments) (Lapin, Dmitry)
July 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Jon Q Wright (Lapin, Dmitry)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wright v. Doe et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jon Q Wright
Represented By: Dmitry Lapin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?