Hahn v. Ohio Security Insurance Company
Diana Hahn |
Ohio Security Insurance Company doing business as Liberty Mutual Insurance |
4:2022cv00369 |
August 24, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
Gregory K Frizzell |
Susan E Huntsman |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Susan E Huntsman ; granting #16 Motion for Protective Order (Re: #16 Joint MOTION for Protective Order ) (kah, Chambers) |
Filing 16 Joint MOTION for Protective Order by Ohio Security Insurance Company (Sullivan, Kelsie) |
NOTICE of Docket Entry Modification; Error: This is a discovery document which should not be filed; Correction: Notified counsel that discovery should not be filed (Re: #14 Notice (Other), ) (sc, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 15 SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Gregory K Frizzell , setting/resetting scheduling order date(s): ( Discovery due by 5/15/2023, Dispositive Motions due by 5/30/2023, Motion Hearing set for 8/15/2023 at 01:30 PM before Judge Gregory K Frizzell) (kjp, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Subpoenas Duces Tecum by Ohio Security Insurance Company (With attachments) (Sullivan, Kelsie) Modified on 10/4/2022 ; this document is a discovery document. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 26-3, discovery material is not to be filed (sc, Dpty Clk). |
Filing 13 JOINT STATUS REPORT by Diana Hahn (Hamilton, Laura) |
Filing 12 ORDER by Judge Gregory K Frizzell , directing parties to file joint status report ( Status Report due by 9/23/2022) (kjp, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 11 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Ohio Security Insurance Company (Sullivan, Kelsie) |
Filing 10 ANSWER (Re: State Court Petition/Complaint ) by Ohio Security Insurance Company (Sullivan, Kelsie) |
Filing 9 JURY DEMAND by Diana Hahn (Smolen, Donald) |
Filing 8 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Hunter Keith Bailey on behalf of Diana Hahn (Bailey, Hunter) |
Filing 7 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Lawrence Richard Murphy, Jr on behalf of Diana Hahn (Murphy, Lawrence) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Laura L Hamilton on behalf of Diana Hahn (Hamilton, Laura) |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Donald Eugene Smolen, II on behalf of Diana Hahn (Smolen, Donald) |
Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , directing Ohio Security Insurance Company to file a Corporate Disclosure Statement pursuant to FRCvP 7.1 within seven (7) days of this order, if they have not already done so. The parties shall use the form entitled Corporate Disclosure Statement available on the Courts website (please do not refile if already filed on non-court form unless directed to do so). If you have already filed your Corporate Disclosure Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Corporate Disclosure Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (sc, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Kelsie M Sullivan on behalf of Ohio Security Insurance Company (Sullivan, Kelsie) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Removal from Tulsa, case number CJ-22-2441 (paid $402 filing fee; receipt number AOKNDC-2666785) by Ohio Security Insurance Company (With attachments) (Sullivan, Kelsie) |
Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Ohio Security Insurance Company (Sullivan, Kelsie) |
PETITION/COMPLAINT filed in State Court against All Defendants by Diana Hahn (lmt, Dpty Clk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.