BTM Wireless, Inc. v. BearCom Group, Inc.
| BTM Wireless, Inc. |
| BearCom Group, Inc. |
| 4:2022cv00401 |
| September 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Gregory K Frizzell |
| Christine D Little |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Gregory K Frizzell , setting/resetting scheduling order date(s): ( Discovery due by 4/28/2023, Dispositive Motions due by 5/12/2023, Motion Hearing set for 8/15/2023 at 01:30 PM before Judge Gregory K Frizzell, Proposed Pretrial Order due by 9/25/2023, Pretrial Conference set for 10/2/2023 at 09:30 AM before Judge Gregory K Frizzell, Jury Trial set for 10/16/2023 at 09:30 AM before Judge Gregory K Frizzell) (kjp, Dpty Clk)
|
| Filing 15 JOINT STATUS REPORT by BTM Wireless, Inc. (Waller, Mark) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER by Judge Gregory K Frizzell , directing parties to file joint status report ( Status Report due by 10/26/2022) (kjp, Dpty Clk)
|
| NOTICE of Docket Entry Modification; Error: this is a multi-event which cannot be processed in CM/ECF; Correction: efiled Counterclaim dkt #13 (Re: #11 Answer ) (srt, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER with Jury Demand (Re: #13 Counterclaim ) by BTM Wireless, Inc. (Waller, Mark) Modified on 10/4/2022 to edit docket text to reflect correct link (srt, Dpty Clk). |
| Filing 13 COUNTERCLAIM against BTM Wireless, Inc. by BearCom Group, Inc. (srt, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER with Jury Demand (Re: State Court Petition/Complaint ) by BearCom Group, Inc. (Winland, Lori) Modified on 10/4/2022 ; this is a multi-event which cannot be processed in CM/ECF - see Counterclaim dkt #13 (srt, Dpty Clk). |
| Filing 10 STATUS REPORT on Removed Action by BearCom Group, Inc. (Winland, Lori) |
| Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (identifying: Corporate Parent BearCom Acquisition Corporation, Corporate Parent OAO Acquisitions,Inc. for BearCom Group, Inc.) by BearCom Group, Inc. (Winland, Lori) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Collin Norman McCarthy on behalf of BearCom Group, Inc. [Note: Attorney Collin Norman McCarthy added to party BearCom Group, Inc.(pty:dft).] (McCarthy, Collin) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , directing BTM Wireless, Inc. to file a Corporate Disclosure Statement pursuant to FRCvP 7.1 within seven (7) days of this order, if they have not already done so. The parties shall use the form entitled Corporate Disclosure Statement available on the Courts website (please do not refile if already filed on non-court form unless directed to do so). If you have already filed your Corporate Disclosure Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Corporate Disclosure Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (lmt, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by BTM Wireless, Inc. (Waller, Mark) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Mark Alston Waller on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Waller, Mark) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , directing BearCom Group, Inc. to file a Corporate Disclosure Statement pursuant to FRCvP 7.1 within seven (7) days of this order, if they have not already done so. The parties shall use the form entitled Corporate Disclosure Statement available on the Courts website (please do not refile if already filed on non-court form unless directed to do so). If you have already filed your Corporate Disclosure Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Corporate Disclosure Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (lmt, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Lori Winland on behalf of BearCom Group, Inc. (Winland, Lori) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Removal with Jury Demand from Tulsa County District Court, case number CJ-2022-02572 (paid $402 filing fee; receipt number AOKNDC-2677934) by BearCom Group, Inc. (With attachments) (Winland, Lori) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by BearCom Group, Inc. (Winland, Lori) |
| PETITION/COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed in State Court against All Defendants by BTM Wireless, Inc. (lmt, Dpty Clk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: BTM Wireless, Inc. v. BearCom Group, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: BTM Wireless, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | J David Jorgenson |
| Represented By: | Mark Alston Waller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: BearCom Group, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Lori Winland |
| Represented By: | Collin Norman McCarthy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
