Russell v. Ballard et al
Jason Curtis Russell |
Matthew J Ballard and Erin O'Quinn |
4:2022cv00416 |
September 26, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
John F Heil |
Christine D Little |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER by Chief Judge John F Heil, III ; setting/resetting Filing Fee deadline(s): ( Initial Filing Fee due by 11/3/2022); directing court clerk to take action; denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Re: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis ) (JFH1, Chambers) |
***Remark: one blank motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (form AO-240) marked "amended" and identified for Case No. 22-cv-416-JFH-CDL and one blank civil rights complaint (form PRIS-14) marked 'amended' and identified for case no. 22-cv-0416-JFH-CDL mailed to Jason Curtis Russell #44550-509 USP Allenwood PO BOX 3000 WHITE DEER, PA 17887 (Re: #3 Order,, Setting/Resetting Filing Fee Deadline(s),, Directing Court Clerk to Take Action,, Ruling on Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, ) (blc, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Jason Curtis Russell (lmt, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Jason Curtis Russell (lmt, Dpty Clk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.