Winningham v. LNU et al
| John W Winningham, Jr |
| Lanny LNU, Leon Rademacher, City of Broken Arrow, Oklahoma, City of Sallisaw, Oklahoma, Tulsa County and Storey Wrecker Services |
| 4:2022cv00466 |
| October 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Susan E Huntsman |
| Terence Kern |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
MINUTE ORDER by Judge Terence Kern - Motion for Entry of Default (Dkt. 4) is denied as premature as defendants have not been served ; denying #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; denying #4 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (Re: #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis , #4 MOTION for Entry of Default for Failure to Answer ) (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (lmc, Chambers)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Entry of Default for Failure to Answer by John W Winningham, Jr (ll, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by John W Winningham, Jr (ll, Dpty Clk) (Main Document 3 replaced on 10/24/2022 to add file-stamp date) (ll, Dpty Clk). |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants by John W Winningham, Jr (ll, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by John W Winningham, Jr (ll, Dpty Clk) |
| ***Remark: 4 Summons in hold tray (Re: #2 Complaint ) (ll, Dpty Clk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
