McCurley v Crow
| Kenneth Kelly McCurley |
| Scott Crow |
| 4:2022cv00471 |
| October 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Claire V Eagan |
| Christine D Little |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
MAIL to Kenneth Kelly McCurley Returned - remailed on 12/08/2022 to North Fork Correctional Facility 1605 E Main Sayre, OK 73662 - new address obtained from docket sheet. (Re: #9 Order,,,, Setting/Resetting Deadline(s)/Hearing(s),,,,,,,, Directing Court Clerk to Take Action,,, ) (ll, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE of Change of Address by Kenneth Kelly McCurley (ll, Dpty Clk)
|
|
***Remark: Order #9 remailed to Petitioner at North Fork Correctional Facility (Re: #9 Order,,,, Setting/Resetting Deadline(s)/Hearing(s),,,,,,,, Directing Court Clerk to Take Action,,, ) (ll, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing 11
ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Samantha Oard on behalf of Scott Crow [Note: Attorney Samantha Oard added to party Scott Crow(pty:res).] (Oard, Samantha)
|
|
Filing 10
LETTER re: filing fees (docket sheet sent) by Kenneth Kelly McCurley (ll, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan - DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO FILE LIMITED RESPONSE - The Clerk of Court shall send, electronically, the petition (Dkt. # 1) and this order to the Office of the Attorney General for the State of Oklahoma at fhc.docket@oag.ok.gov; no later than 30 days after the entry of this order, respondent shall file a limited response addressing whether this Court has jurisdiction to adjudicate the petition and, if so, whether the petition should be dismissed as barred by the statute of limitations; and McCurley may file an optional reply brief no later than 30 days after the date that respondent files the limited response., setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Miscellaneous Deadline set for 1/3/2023), directing court clerk to take action (Re: #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
|
***Remark: Emailed docket numbers 1 and 9 to the Office of the Attorney General at fhc.docket@oag.ok.gov (Re: #9 Order,,,, Setting/Resetting Deadline(s)/Hearing(s),,,,,,,, Directing Court Clerk to Take Action,,, ) (sc, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing 8
FILING FEES Paid in Full by Kenneth Kelly McCurley (ll, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION for Speedy Trial by Kenneth Kelly McCurley (ll, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan (ORDER TO CURE FILING FEE DEFICIENCY) - No later than 21 days after the entry of this order, or on or before November 29, 2022, McCurley shall either pay the $5 filing fee, file a properly supported motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, or show cause in writing for his failure to do so. The Clerk of Court shall send to McCurley one blank motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (form AO-240), identified for Case No. 22-CV-0471-CVE-CDL. The motion to expedite ruling (Dkt. # 3) is denied. ; setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Filing Fee due by 11/29/2022); directing court clerk to take action; denying #3 Motion to Expedite Ruling (Re: #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 , #3 MOTION to Expedite Ruling ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
|
***Remark: One blank motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (form A0-240) identified for case no. 22-cv-0471-CVE-CDL mailed to Kenneth Kelly McCurley #653180 Lawton Correctional Facility 8607 SE FLOWER MOUND RD LAWTON, OK 73501 (Re: #6 Order,,,, Setting/Resetting Deadline(s)/Hearing(s),,,, Directing Court Clerk to Take Action,,,,,,,, Ruling on Motion to Expedite Ruling,,, ) (blc, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing 5
LETTER to petitioner (docket sheet and courtesy copy sent) (lmt, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing 4
LETTER from petitioner requesting copy of petition by Kenneth Kelly McCurley (lmt, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to Expedite Ruling by Kenneth Kelly McCurley (blc, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing 2
MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , : Due to the inclusion of personal identifiers and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(e)(2), the Court hereby, for good cause, restricts remote electronic access to Document #1 to registered case participants. If a future filing in this case contains personal identifiers, the Court may impose the same restrictions on said filing pursuant to this order. (Re: #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 ) (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (sc, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 by Kenneth Kelly McCurley (sc, Dpty Clk) Modified on 10/25/2022 PDF restricted per Order #2 (sc, Dpty Clk).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: McCurley v Crow | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Kenneth Kelly McCurley | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Scott Crow | |
| Represented By: | Samantha Oard |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
