Perry v. Harpe
Elston Craig Perry |
Steven Harpe |
4:2022cv00512 |
November 21, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
Claire V Eagan |
Christine D Little |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
***Civil Case Terminated (see document number #5 ) (lmt, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 5 JUDGMENT by Judge Claire V Eagan (JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL), dismissing/terminating case (terminates case) (Re: #4 Order,,, #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 ) (Documents Terminated: #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 ) (RGG, Chambers) |
Filing 4 ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan that this action is dismissed without prejudice, under FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b), for lack of prosecution. This is a final order terminating this action. (Re: #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 ) (RGG, Chambers) |
Filing 3 ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan - ORDER TO CURE DEFICIENCIES - No later than 21 days after the entry of this order, or on or before December 28, 2022, Perry shall either pay the $5 filing fee or file a properly supported motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, using the court-approved form; the Clerk of Court shall send to Perry one blank motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (form AO 240), identified for Case No. 22 CV 0512-CVE CDL; no later than 21 days after the entry of this order, or on or before December 28, 2022, Perry shall file a properly completed petition for writ of habeas corpus, using the court-approved form; and the Clerk of Court shall send to Perry one blank 28 U.S.C. 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus (form AO-241), identified for Case No. 22-CV-0512-CVE-CDL., setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Filing Fee due by 12/28/2022, Miscellaneous Deadline set for 12/28/2022), directing court clerk to take action (Re: #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 ) (RGG, Chambers) |
***Remark: one blank motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (form AO 240), identified for Case No. 22 CV 0512-CVE CDL and one blank 28 U.S.C. 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus (form AO-241), identified for Case No. 22-CV-0512-CVE-CDL mailed to Elston Perry, LCRF, 8607 SE Flower Mound Road, Lawton, OK 73501 (Re: #3 Order,,,,, Setting/Resetting Deadline(s)/Hearing(s),,,,, Directing Court Clerk to Take Action,,,,,,,,, ) (blc, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 2 LETTER re: petition and filing fee by Elston Craig Perry (ll, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 by Elston Craig Perry (blc, Dpty Clk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Perry v. Harpe | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Elston Craig Perry | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Steven Harpe | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.