Edgar v. Social Security Administration
| Mona Lisa Edgar |
| Social Security Administration |
| 4:2022cv00518 |
| November 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Christine D Little |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Rachel Dawn Parrilli on behalf of Social Security Administration [Note: Attorney Rachel Dawn Parrilli added to party Social Security Administration(pty:dft).] (Parrilli, Rachel) |
Filing 11
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Christine D Little Case Management Order (CDL1, Chambers)
|
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed re: Social Security Administration Served Atty General 12/7/22 (Re: #2 Social Security Complaint ) by Mona Lisa Edgar (With attachments) (Parmele, Daniel) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed re: Social Security Administration Served ORC 12/5/22 (Re: #2 Social Security Complaint ) by Mona Lisa Edgar (With attachments) (Parmele, Daniel) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed re: Social Security Administration served US Atty 12/6/22 (Re: #2 Social Security Complaint ) by Mona Lisa Edgar (With attachments) (Parmele, Daniel) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Issued by Court Clerk as to Social Security Administration (lmt, Dpty Clk) |
|
Filing 6
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Christine D Little Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 3) and Motion to Waive Local Counsel Requirement (Doc. 5) are granted. ; granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; granting #5 Motion to Waive (Re: #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis , #5 MOTION to Waive Requirement of Association of Local Counsel ) (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (CDL1, Chambers)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Waive Requirement of Association of Local Counsel by Mona Lisa Edgar (Parmele, Daniel) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Daniel A Parmele on behalf of Mona Lisa Edgar (Parmele, Daniel) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Mona Lisa Edgar (Parmele, Daniel) |
| Filing 2 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration by Mona Lisa Edgar (Parmele, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Mona Lisa Edgar [Note: Attorney Daniel A Parmele added to party Mona Lisa Edgar(pty:pla).] (Parmele, Daniel) |
| ***Remark: 3 summons in hold tray (blc, Dpty Clk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Edgar v. Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mona Lisa Edgar | |
| Represented By: | Daniel Parmele |
| Represented By: | Daniel A Parmele |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Rachel Dawn Parrilli |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
