Fortex Solutions LLC et al v. Carr et al
Fortex Solutions LLC and Elevation Labs LLC |
David Carr, Perfect Grow California, Perfect Enterprises, PGLabs Inc, PGLabs LLC, PGLabs, Inc. and PGLabs, LLC |
4:2023cv00102 |
March 21, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
Gregory K Frizzell |
Christine D Little |
Mark T Steele |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk reassigning the magistrate judge in this case pursuant to General Order 23-6, reassigning case to Magistrate Judge Mark T Steele, Magistrate Judge Christine D Little no longer assigned to case, changing case number to 23-cv-102-GKF-MTS (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (tjc, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Issued by Court Clerk as to All Defendants (blc, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 10 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Heather M. Crabill on behalf of Elevation Labs LLC, Fortex Solutions LLC [Note: Attorney Heather M. Crabill added to party Elevation Labs LLC(pty:pla), Attorney Heather M. Crabill added to party Fortex Solutions LLC(pty:pla).] (Crabill, Heather) |
Filing 9 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Robert A. Hawkins on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Richmond, William) Modified on 3/27/2023 to correct attorney (lmt, Dpty Clk). |
Filing 8 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by William Richmond on behalf of All Plaintiffs [Note: Attorney William Richmond added to party Elevation Labs LLC(pty:pla), Attorney William Richmond added to party Fortex Solutions LLC(pty:pla).] (Richmond, William) |
Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER by Judge Gregory K Frizzell granting plaintiff's motion for admission pro hac vice [Doc. 5]. William S. Richmond, Robert A. Hawkins, and Heather M. Crabill are admitted pro hac vice and are directed to file separate entries of appearances forthwith ; granting #5 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice (Re: #5 MOTION for Attorney(s) Heather M. Crabill, Robert A. Hawkins, William S. Richmond to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $300 PHV fee; receipt number AOKNDC-2782273) ) (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (kjp, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , directing Fortex Solutions LLC and Elevation Labs LLC to file a Disclosure Statement pursuant to FRCvP 7.1 and LCvR 7.1-1, if applicable. The parties shall use the form entitled Disclosure Statement available on the Courts website. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (dla, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Attorney(s) Heather M. Crabill, Robert A. Hawkins, William S. Richmond to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $300 PHV fee; receipt number AOKNDC-2782273) by Elevation Labs LLC, Fortex Solutions LLC (With attachments) (Osenbaugh, Marissa) |
Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (identifying: Corporate Parent Elevation Labs LLC for Fortex Solutions LLC) by Fortex Solutions LLC (Osenbaugh, Marissa) |
Filing 3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (identifying: Corporate Parent Fortex Solutions LLC for Elevation Labs LLC) by Elevation Labs LLC (Osenbaugh, Marissa) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants Plaintiff's Original Complaint (paid $402 filing fee; receipt number AOKNDC-2782230) by Fortex Solutions LLC, Elevation Labs LLC (Osenbaugh, Marissa) |
Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Elevation Labs LLC, Fortex Solutions LLC (Osenbaugh, Marissa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.