Chiwanga v. State of Oklahoma
| Gentner F Drummond |
| Jackson Peter Chiwanga |
| State of Oklahoma |
| 4:2023cv00141 |
| April 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Claire V Eagan |
| Jodi F Jayne |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan - Chiwanga's first motion for extension of time to file petitioner's response filed May 30, 2023 (Dkt. # 8) is granted. Chiwanga shall file a response on or before June 14, 2023. The Clerk of Court shall note on the record the substitution of Gentner F. Drummond, Oklahoma Attorney General, in place of the State of Oklahoma as party respondent. ; setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Responses due by 6/14/2023, Replies due by 6/28/2023); directing court clerk to take action; granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion (Re: #6 MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Lack of Jurisdiction and As Time-Barred, #8 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
|
***Remark: the substitution of Gentner F. Drummond, Oklahoma Attorney General, has been made in place of the State of Oklahoma as party respondent (Re: #9 Order,,,, Setting/Resetting Deadline(s)/Hearing(s),,,, Directing Court Clerk to Take Action,,,,,,,, Ruling on Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion,,, ) (blc, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion (Re: #6 MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Lack of Jurisdiction and As Time-Barred ) by Jackson Peter Chiwanga (mlb, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing 7
BRIEF in Support of Motion (Re: #6 MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Lack of Jurisdiction and As Time-Barred ) by State of Oklahoma ; (With attachments) (Incremona, Mary)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Lack of Jurisdiction and As Time-Barred by State of Oklahoma (Incremona, Mary)
|
|
Filing 5
MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , directing State of Oklahoma to file a Disclosure Statement pursuant to FRCvP 7.1 and LCvR 7.1-1, if applicable. The parties shall use the form entitled Disclosure Statement available on the Courts website. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (dla, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing 4
ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Mary Rebecca Incremona on behalf of State of Oklahoma [Note: Attorney Mary Rebecca Incremona added to party State of Oklahoma(pty:res).] (Incremona, Mary)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan , directing Respondent to show cause why the writ should not issue and file a response to the petition( Responses due by 5/15/2023, Replies due by 6/14/2023), directing court clerk to take action (Re: #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
|
***Remark: Emailed docket numbers 1 and 3 to the Office of the Attorney General at fhc.docket@oag.ok.gov (Re: #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 , #3 Order,, Directing Respondent to Show Cause re: PWHC,,,, Directing Court Clerk to Take Action, ) (lmt, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing 2
FILING FEES Paid in Full by Jackson Peter Chiwanga (blc, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 by Jackson Peter Chiwanga (blc, Dpty Clk) (blc, Dpty Clk). Modified on 4/10/2023 to replace missing page in pdf (blc, Dpty Clk).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
