Papenek v. Dish Network
Plaintiff: Jesse I Papenek
Defendant: Dish Network
Case Number: 4:2023cv00184
Filed: May 5, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Jodi F Jayne
Referring Judge: Terence Kern
2 Judge: Mark T Steele
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 REPLY to Response to Motion (Re: #7 MOTION to Compel Arbitration MOTION to Stay ) by Dish Network ; (Thrutchley, Christopher)
June 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk, reassigning case to Magistrate Judge Mark T Steele, Magistrate Judge Jodi F Jayne no longer assigned to case, changing case number to 23-cv-184-TCK-MTS (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (srt, Dpty Clk)
June 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MOTION to Compel Litigation by Jesse I Papenek (dla, Dpty Clk)
May 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 JOINT STATUS REPORT by Dish Network (Thrutchley, Christopher)
May 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION to Compel Arbitration , MOTION to Stay by Dish Network (With attachments) (Thrutchley, Christopher)
May 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (identifying: Corporate Parent Dish Network Corporation, Corporate Parent Dish DBS Corporation, Corporate Parent Dish Network, L.L.C., Corporate Parent Dish Orbital Corporation for Dish Network) by Dish Network (Thrutchley, Christopher)
May 8, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER by Judge Terence Kern for Joint Status Report, directing parties to file joint status report ( Status Report due by 6/5/2023) (lmc, Chambers)
May 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , directing Jesse I Papenek and Dish Network to file a Disclosure Statement pursuant to FRCvP 7.1 and LCvR 7.1-1, if applicable. The parties shall use the form entitled Disclosure Statement available on the Courts website. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (lmt, Dpty Clk)
May 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Christopher S Thrutchley on behalf of Dish Network (Thrutchley, Christopher)
May 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE of Removal from Tulsa County, case number CJ-2023-1335 (paid $402 filing fee; receipt number AOKNDC-2806609) by Dish Network (With attachments) (Thrutchley, Christopher)
May 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Dish Network (Thrutchley, Christopher)
April 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Amended PETITION/COMPLAINT filed in State Court against Dish Network by Jesse I Papenek (lmt, Dpty Clk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Papenek v. Dish Network
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jesse I Papenek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dish Network
Represented By: Christopher S Thrutchley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?