Jiang v. City of Tulsa
| Hua Jiang |
| City of Tulsa |
| 4:2023cv00255 |
| June 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Claire V Eagan |
| Christine D Little |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
MINUTE ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan - Clarifying that the Pretrial Conference is set 5/3/2024 at 9:30 AM as per the Scheduling Order (Dkt. # 15). (The ECF entry of 9:15 AM was incorrect.), setting/resetting scheduling order date(s): ( Pretrial Conference set for 5/3/2024 at 09:30 AM before Judge Claire V Eagan) (Re: #15 Scheduling Order,, Setting/Resetting Scheduling Order Date(s), ) (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (RGG, Chambers)
|
|
Filing 15
SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan (INITIAL), setting/resetting scheduling order date(s): (Motions in Limine due 2/27/2024) ( Discovery due by 12/20/2023, Dispositive Motions due by 1/24/2024, Proposed Pretrial Order due by 4/9/2024, Pretrial Conference set for 5/3/2024 at 09:15 AM before Judge Claire V Eagan, Jury Trial set for 5/20/2024 at 09:15 AM before Judge Claire V Eagan) (RGG, Chambers)
|
| Filing 14 JOINT STATUS REPORT by Hua Jiang (Smith, Mark) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan - Defendant City of Tulsa's Partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Equal Pay Act Claim and Brief in Support (Dkt. # 8) is granted, and plaintiff's EPA claim (Claim VII) is dismissed without prejudice. ; granting #8 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Re: State Court Petition/Complaint, #8 Partial MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion (Re: #8 Partial MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim ) by Hua Jiang ; (Smith, Mark) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan , directing parties to file joint status report ( Status Report due by 7/31/2023) (RGG, Chambers)
|
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan - The pleading at Dkt. # 7 is stricken, as it has an incorrect PDF attached. The Court notes that City of Tulsa's has refiled its answer at Dkt. # 9., striking/withdrawing document(s) (Re: #7 Answer ) (Documents Terminated: #7 Answer ) (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (RGG, Chambers)
|
| Filing 9 ANSWER with Jury Demand (Re: State Court Petition/Complaint ) by City of Tulsa (Martin, Hayes) |
| Filing 8 Partial MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by City of Tulsa (Martin, Hayes) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER with Jury Demand (Re: State Court Petition/Complaint ) by City of Tulsa (Martin, Hayes) Modified on 6/29/2023 - STRICKEN per 10 - refiled as dkt #9 (lmt, Dpty Clk). |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Mark Allen Smith on behalf of Hua Jiang [Note: Attorney Mark Allen Smith added to party Hua Jiang(pty:pla).] (Smith, Mark) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , directing Hua Jiang and City of Tulsa to file a Disclosure Statement pursuant to FRCvP 7.1 and LCvR 7.1-1, if applicable. The parties shall use the form entitled Disclosure Statement available on the Courts website. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (lmt, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by R Lawson Vaughn, III on behalf of City of Tulsa [Note: Attorney R Lawson Vaughn, III added to party City of Tulsa(pty:dft).] (Vaughn, R) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Hayes Thomas Martin on behalf of City of Tulsa (Martin, Hayes) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Removal from Tulsa County District Court, case number CJ-2023-1968 (paid $402 filing fee; receipt number AOKNDC-2832000) by City of Tulsa (With attachments) (Martin, Hayes) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by City of Tulsa (Martin, Hayes) |
| PETITION/COMPLAINT filed in State Court against City of Tulsa by Hua Jiang (lmt, Dpty Clk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jiang v. City of Tulsa | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Hua Jiang | |
| Represented By: | Daniel E Smolen |
| Represented By: | Mark Allen Smith |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: City of Tulsa | |
| Represented By: | Hayes Thomas Martin |
| Represented By: | R Lawson Vaughn, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
