Emrit v. Jules
Plaintiff: Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant: Sabine Aisha Jules
Case Number: 4:2023cv00278
Filed: July 7, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Claire V Eagan
Referring Judge: Mark T Steele
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 APPEAL NUMBER INFORMATION from Circuit Court assigning Case Number 23-5090 (#8) (Re: #8 Notice of Appeal to Circuit Court ) (dla, Dpty Clk)
August 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 PRELIMINARY RECORD Sent to Circuit Court (Re: #8 Notice of Appeal to Circuit Court ) (With attachments) (blc, Dpty Clk)
August 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEAL to Circuit Court (Re: #6 Judgment, Dismissing/Terminating Case, ) by Ronald Satish Emrit (blc, Dpty Clk)
July 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , directing Ronald Satish Emrit to file a Disclosure Statement pursuant to FRCvP 7.1 and LCvR 7.1-1, if applicable. The parties shall use the form entitled Disclosure Statement available on the Courts website. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (dla, Dpty Clk)
July 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 JUDGMENT by Judge Claire V Eagan (JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL), dismissing/terminating case (terminates case) (Re: #5 Opinion and Order,,,, Ruling on Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, ) (RGG, Chambers)
July 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan - Plaintiff's complaint (Dkt. # 2) is dismissed without prejudice for improper venue. A separate judgment of dismissal is entered herewith. Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. # 3) is moot. ; finding as moot #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Re: #2 Complaint, #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis ) (RGG, Chambers)
July 11, 2023 Opinion or Order ***Civil Case Terminated (see document number #6 ) (srt, Dpty Clk)
July 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , directing Ronald Satish Emrit to file a Disclosure Statement pursuant to FRCvP 7.1 and LCvR 7.1-1, if applicable. The parties shall use the form entitled Disclosure Statement available on the Courts website. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (mlb, Dpty Clk)
July 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Ronald Satish Emrit (mlb, Dpty Clk)
July 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Sabine Aisha Jules by Ronald Satish Emrit (mlb, Dpty Clk)
July 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Ronald Satish Emrit (mlb, Dpty Clk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Emrit v. Jules
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronald Satish Emrit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sabine Aisha Jules
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?