White v. Petty et al
Malissa White |
Michael Petty and Elizabeth Petty |
4:2023cv00399 |
September 14, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
Jodi F Jayne |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk re remand (lmt, Dpty Clk) |
***Civil Case Terminated (see document number #14 ) (lmt, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 14 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jodi F Jayne ; striking/withdrawing document(s); remanding case (terminates case) ; granting #11 Motion to Remand; finding as moot #13 Motion to Remand (Re: #12 Order, Directing Parties to File Joint Status Report, #11 MOTION to Remand , #13 MOTION to Remand Defendants' Motion to Confess Remand ) (Documents Terminated: #12 Order, Directing Parties to File Joint Status Report ) (kah, Chambers) |
Filing 13 MOTION to Remand Defendants' Motion to Confess Remand by Elizabeth Petty, Michael Petty (Jones, Daniel) |
Filing 12 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jodi F Jayne , directing parties to file joint status report ( Status Report due by 10/11/2023) (sdc, Dpty Clk) Modified on 10/13/2023 - STRICKEN per #14 (lmt, Dpty Clk). |
Filing 11 MOTION to Remand by Malissa White (Wandres, Patrick) |
Filing 10 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (identifying: Corporate Parent Malissa White for Malissa White) by Malissa White (Wandres, Patrick) |
Filing 9 ANSWER with Jury Demand (Re: State Court Petition/Complaint ) by Elizabeth Petty, Michael Petty (Jones, Daniel) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF CASE TO A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DECLINATION OF CONSENT FORM. ACTION REQUIRED: This case has been randomly assigned to a United States magistrate judge for all purposes, including trial, final entry of judgment, and direct review by the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. Each party will be deemed to have knowingly and voluntarily consented to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge, if the attached form is not signed and returned within the applicable deadline. The plaintiff or removing party must serve a copy of this notice upon all other parties to this action. (blc, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , directing Malissa White, Michael Petty, Elizabeth Petty to file a Disclosure Statement pursuant to FRCvP 7.1 and LCvR 7.1-1, if applicable. The parties shall use the form entitled Disclosure Statement available on the Courts website. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (blc, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Loren Ray Toombs on behalf of Malissa White [Note: Attorney Loren Ray Toombs added to party Malissa White(pty:pla).] (Toombs, Loren) |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Patrick William Wandres on behalf of Malissa White (Wandres, Patrick) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Alyssa Denae Poe on behalf of All Defendants (Poe, Alyssa) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Daniel Khristian Jones on behalf of All Defendants (Jones, Daniel) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Removal with Jury Demand from Tulsa County Dist Court, case number CJ-2023-02955 (paid $402 filing fee; receipt number AOKNDC-2876130) by Elizabeth Petty, Michael Petty (With attachments) (Jones, Daniel) |
Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Elizabeth Petty, Michael Petty (Jones, Daniel) |
PETITION/COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed in State Court against Elizabeth Petty, Michael Petty by Malissa White (blc, Dpty Clk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.