Sherwood v. Social Security Administration
| Vaughn Sherwood |
| Social Security Administration |
| 4:2023cv00495 |
| November 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Susan E Huntsman |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Nolan Fields on behalf of Social Security Administration [Note: Attorney Nolan Fields added to party Social Security Administration(pty:dft).] (Fields, Nolan) |
Filing 6
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Susan E Huntsman ; granting #3 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief; granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Re: #3 MOTION for Relief from Local Rule LGnR4-3 Requiring Association with Local Counsel , #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis ) (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (kah, Chambers)
|
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Kyle Voils on behalf of Social Security Administration [Note: Attorney Kyle Voils added to party Social Security Administration(pty:dft).] (Voils, Kyle) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF CASE TO A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DECLINATION OF CONSENT FORM. ACTION REQUIRED: This case has been randomly assigned to a United States magistrate judge for all purposes, including trial, final entry of judgment, and direct review by the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. Each party will be deemed to have knowingly and voluntarily consented to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge, if the attached form is not signed and returned within the applicable deadline. The plaintiff or removing party must serve a copy of this notice upon all other parties to this action. (lmt, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Relief from Local Rule LGnR4-3 Requiring Association with Local Counsel by Vaughn Sherwood (Konoski, Bryan) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Vaughn Sherwood (Konoski, Bryan) |
| Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration (Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Fed. R. Civ. P. Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions, the Notice of Electronic Case Filing (NEF) for this Complaint has been transmitted to the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Oklahoma, as well as the Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel. No summons will issue.) by Vaughn Sherwood (With attachments) (Konoski, Bryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sherwood v. Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Vaughn Sherwood | |
| Represented By: | Bryan Konoski |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Kyle Voils |
| Represented By: | Nolan Fields |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
