McClure v. Eli Lilly and Company
| Blake McClure |
| Eli Lilly and Company |
| 4:2023cv00551 |
| December 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Mark T Steele |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER by Nicole Durso, Clerk of the MDL Panel, transferring case (terminates case) (drw, Dpty Clk) Modified on 2/16/2024 to correct file date (drw, Dpty Clk).
|
| Filing 7 ***Remark: Received Minute Order from MDL re: transferee clerk to transmit a certified copy of the Panel Order to transfer to the district court from which the action is being transferred (drw, Dpty Clk) Modified on 2/16/2024 to correct file date (drw, Dpty Clk). |
| Filing 6 ***Remark: Received Conditional Transfer Order from MDL re: stay is lifted (drw, Dpty Clk) Modified on 2/16/2024 to correct file date (drw, Dpty Clk). |
| Filing 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Blake McClure (Stine, Quinn) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF CASE TO A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DECLINATION OF CONSENT FORM. ACTION REQUIRED: This case has been randomly assigned to a United States magistrate judge for all purposes, including trial, final entry of judgment, and direct review by the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. Each party will be deemed to have knowingly and voluntarily consented to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge, if the attached form is not signed and returned within the applicable deadline. The plaintiff or removing party must serve a copy of this notice upon all other parties to this action. (lmt, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , directing Blake McClure to file a Disclosure Statement pursuant to FRCvP 7.1 and LCvR 7.1-1, if applicable. The parties shall use the form entitled Disclosure Statement available on the Courts website. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (lmt, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Blake McClure (Stine, Quinn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Eli Lilly and Company (paid $405 filing fee; receipt number AOKNDC-2924317) by Blake McClure [Note: Attorney Quinn Stine added to party Blake McClure(pty:pla).] (With attachments) (Stine, Quinn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: McClure v. Eli Lilly and Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Blake McClure | |
| Represented By: | Quinn Patrick Stine |
| Represented By: | Quinn Stine |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Eli Lilly and Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
