Ballou v. Wells
Plaintiff: Morgan Ballou
Defendant: Mark Allan Wells
Case Number: 4:2024cv00023
Filed: January 18, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Gregory K Frizzell
Referring Judge: Christine D Little
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 13, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MINUTE ORDER by Judge Gregory K Frizzell Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(2), the Court finds good cause for delay in issuing a Scheduling Order in this case, as defendant Mark Allan Wells has filed a Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 6] which should first be resolved. (Re: #6 First MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim ) (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (GKF1, Chambers)
March 12, 2024 Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , assigning this case to a district judge. Assigning case to District Judge Gregory K Frizzell and Magistrate Judge Christine D Little, changing case number to 24-cv-23-GKF-CDL (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (tjc, Dpty Clk)
March 12, 2024 Filing 12 First JOINT STATUS REPORT by Morgan Ballou (Sacra, Damon)
March 8, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Christine D Little On February 13, 2024, the parties were directed to file a Joint Status Report by March 5, 2024. (See Doc. 7). The report has not been filed. The parties are directed to file the Joint Status Report by March 12, 2024, setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Status Report due by 3/12/2024) (Re: #7 Order, Directing Parties to File Joint Status Report ) (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (CDLJ, Judge)
February 29, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Christine D Little Plaintiff's unopposed Motion for Additional Time to Respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 9) is granted. ; setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Responses due by 3/25/2024); granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion (Re: #6 First MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , #9 First MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion ) (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (CDL1, Chambers)
February 28, 2024 Filing 9 First MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion (Re: #6 First MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim ) by Morgan Ballou (Sacra, Damon)
February 14, 2024 Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , directing Mark Allan Wells to file a Disclosure Statement pursuant to FRCvP 7.1 and LCvR 7.1-1, if applicable. The parties shall use the form entitled Disclosure Statement available on the Courts website. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (sna, Dpty Clk)
February 13, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Christine D Little , directing parties to file joint status report ( Status Report due by 3/5/2024) (CDLJ, Judge)
February 12, 2024 Filing 6 First MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Mark Allan Wells [Note: Attorney Ryan H. Heatherman added to party Mark Allan Wells(pty:dft).] (Heatherman, Ryan)
January 18, 2024 Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued by Court Clerk as to Mark Allan Wells by Morgan Ballou (drw, Dpty Clk)
January 18, 2024 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF CASE TO A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DECLINATION OF CONSENT FORM. ACTION REQUIRED: This case has been randomly assigned to a United States magistrate judge for all purposes, including trial, final entry of judgment, and direct review by the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. Each party will be deemed to have knowingly and voluntarily consented to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge, if the attached form is not signed and returned within the applicable deadline. The plaintiff or removing party must serve a copy of this notice upon all other parties to this action. (drw, Dpty Clk)
January 18, 2024 Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , directing Morgan Ballou to file a Disclosure Statement pursuant to FRCvP 7.1 and LCvR 7.1-1, if applicable. The parties shall use the form entitled Disclosure Statement available on the Courts website. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (drw, Dpty Clk)
January 18, 2024 Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Mark Allan Wells (paid $405 filing fee; receipt number AOKNDC-2938062) by Morgan Ballou (Sacra, Damon) Modified on 1/18/2024 to correct against party (lmt, Dpty Clk).
January 18, 2024 Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Morgan Ballou (Sacra, Damon)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ballou v. Wells
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Morgan Ballou
Represented By: Damon Edwin Sacra
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Allan Wells
Represented By: Ryan H. Heatherman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?