Stevens v. Rankins
Rodger D. Stevens |
William Rankins |
4:2024cv00053 |
February 7, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
Tulsa Office |
Gregory K Frizzell |
Mark T Steele |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 RESPONSE to Motion (Re: #8 MOTION to Dismiss Pre-Answer Motion to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus as Time-Barred ) by Rodger D. Stevens ; (atn, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 9 BRIEF in Support of Motion (Re: #8 MOTION to Dismiss Pre-Answer Motion to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus as Time-Barred ) by William Rankins ; (With attachments) (Patterson, Sally) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss Pre-Answer Motion to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus as Time-Barred by William Rankins (Patterson, Sally) |
Filing 7 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Sally Grace Patterson on behalf of William Rankins [Note: Attorney Sally Grace Patterson added to party William Rankins(pty:res).] (Patterson, Sally) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Tessa L Henry on behalf of William Rankins [Note: Attorney Tessa L Henry added to party William Rankins(pty:res).] (Henry, Tessa) |
***Remark: Emailed docket numbers 1 and 5 to the Office of the Attorney General at fhc.docket@oag.ok.gov (Re: #1 , #5 Order, Directing Respondent to Show Cause re: PWHC ) (drw, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 5 ORDER by Judge Gregory K Frizzell , directing Respondent to show cause why the writ should not issue and file a response to the petition( Responses due by 3/15/2024, Replies due by 4/15/2024) (kjp, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 4 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from Oklahoma Eastern |
Filing 3 OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Ronald A. White, transferring case to the Northern District of Oklahoma (case terminated) (acg, Deputy Clerk) [Transferred from Oklahoma Eastern on 2/7/2024.] |
Filing 2 MINUTE ORDER by District Judge Ronald A. White, referring case to Magistrate Judge D. Edward Snow for all further proceedings in accordance with jurisdiction pursuant to 28 USC 636. All future filings shall bear the case number CIV-24-47-RAW-DES. (acg, Deputy Clerk) [Transferred from Oklahoma Eastern on 2/7/2024.] |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 by Rodger D. Stevens (With attachments)(acg, Deputy Clerk) [Transferred from Oklahoma Eastern on 2/7/2024.] |
FILING FEES Paid in Full on 2/7/2024 in the amount of $5, receipt number 21927 (Re: #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 ) by Rodger D. Stevens (eaw, Deputy Clerk) [Transferred from Oklahoma Eastern on 2/7/2024.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Stevens v. Rankins | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Rodger D. Stevens | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: William Rankins | |
Represented By: | Sally Grace Patterson |
Represented By: | Tessa L Henry |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.