Smith v. Buss et al
Channen Ray Ozell Smith |
David Buss, Getner Drummond and Randy Harding |
4:2024cv00077 |
February 22, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
Sara E Hill |
Mark T Steele |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion Re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Re: #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ) by David Buss (Young, Randall) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Randall Don Young on behalf of David Buss [Note: Attorney Randall Don Young added to party David Buss(pty:dft).] (Young, Randall) |
|
***Remark: Emailed docket numbers 1 and 5 to the Office of the Attorney General at fhc.docket@oag.ok.gov (Re: #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #5 Order,, Directing Court Clerk to Take Action,, Directing Respondent to Show Cause re: PWHC, ) (dla, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 4 FILING FEES Paid in Full (drw, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 3 ***Remark: docket sheet sent to petitioner (drw, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 2 LETTER re: filing fee by Channen Ray Ozell Smith (drw, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 by Channen Ray Ozell Smith (drw, Dpty Clk) (Main Document 1 replaced on 2/22/2024 to add notation to first page) (drw, Dpty Clk). Modified on 2/28/2024 to correct event (drw, Dpty Clk). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.