Burger v. Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Micheal John Burger
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 4:2024cv00496
Filed: October 18, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Mark T Steele
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 11, 2024 Filing 8 ADMINISTRATIVE TRANSCRIPT (Re: #2 Social Security Complaint,, ) by Social Security Administration (With attachments) (Durel, Aimee)
November 26, 2024 Filing 7 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Aimee Durel on behalf of Social Security Administration [Note: Attorney Aimee Durel added to party Social Security Administration(pty:dft).] (Durel, Aimee)
November 8, 2024 Filing 6 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Michael James Cooper on behalf of Social Security Administration [Note: Attorney Michael James Cooper added to party Social Security Administration(pty:dft).] (Cooper, Michael)
October 21, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF CASE TO A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DECLINATION OF CONSENT FORM. ACTION REQUIRED: This case has been randomly assigned to a United States magistrate judge for all purposes, including trial, final entry of judgment, and direct review by the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. Each party will be deemed to have knowingly and voluntarily consented to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge, if the attached form is not signed and returned within the applicable deadline. The plaintiff or removing party must serve a copy of this notice upon all other parties to this action. (cjb, Dpty Clk) Modified on 10/22/2024 to correct docket text
October 21, 2024 Filing 4 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Darren Todd Rackley on behalf of Micheal John Burger [Note: Attorney Darren Todd Rackley added to party Micheal John Burger(pty:pla).] (Rackley, Darren)
October 21, 2024 Filing 3 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Gayle Louise Troutman on behalf of Micheal John Burger (Troutman, Gayle)
October 21, 2024 Filing 2 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration (Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Fed. R. Civ. P. Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions, the Notice of Electronic Case Filing (NEF) for this Complaint has been transmitted to the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Oklahoma, as well as the Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel. No summons will issue.) (paid $405 filing fee; receipt number BOKNDC-3091324) by Micheal John Burger (Troutman, Gayle)
October 21, 2024 Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Micheal John Burger (Troutman, Gayle)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Burger v. Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Michael James Cooper
Represented By: Aimee Durel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Micheal John Burger
Represented By: Gayle Louise Troutman
Represented By: Darren Todd Rackley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?