Green v. Rogers
Petitioner: Rico Dion Green
Respondent: David Rogers
Case Number: 4:2025cv00517
Filed: September 29, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Jodi F Jayne
Referring Judge: John D Russell
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 17, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 10 REPLY to Response to Motion (Re: #4 MOTION to Stay and Abey ) by Rico Dion Green ; (Miller, Andrea)
November 17, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 9 EXHIBIT(S) (DVD) (Re: #8 State Court Habeas Transcript(s)/Record(s)) by David Rogers (atn, Dpty Clk) Modified on 11/17/2025 to correct the event (atn, Dpty Clk).
November 17, 2025 Opinion or Order NOTICE of Docket Entry Modification; Error: Wrong event used; Correction: Edited docket text to reflect correct event (Re: #9 State Court Habeas Transcript(s)/Record(s) ) (atn, Dpty Clk)
November 10, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 8 COPIES OF STATE COURT HABEAS TRANSCRIPT(S)/RECORD(S) by David Rogers (Miller, Keeley)
November 10, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 7 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion (Re: #4 MOTION to Stay and Abey ) by David Rogers ; (With attachments) (Miller, Keeley)
October 14, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Keeley Laine Miller on behalf of David Rogers [Note: Attorney Keeley Laine Miller added to party David Rogers(pty:res).] (Miller, Keeley)
October 7, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER by Judge John D Russell , directing court clerk to take action, setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Responses due by 11/12/2025, Replies due by 12/17/2025) (Re: #4 MOTION to Stay and Abey ) (clb, Dpty Clk)
October 7, 2025 Opinion or Order ***Remark: Emailed docket numbers 2, 4 and 5 to the Office of the Attorney General at [email protected] (Re: #2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (paid $5 filing fee; receipt number AOKNDC-3284004), #5 Order,, Directing Court Clerk to Take Action,, Setting/Resetting Deadline(s)/Hearing(s), ) (dla, Dpty Clk) Modified on 10/8/2025 to edit docket text (dla, Dpty Clk).
September 29, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION to Stay and Abey by Rico Dion Green (With attachments) (Miller, Andrea)
September 29, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Andrea Digilio Miller on behalf of Rico Dion Green (Miller, Andrea)
September 29, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (paid $5 filing fee; receipt number AOKNDC-3284004) by Rico Dion Green (Miller, Andrea)
September 29, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Rico Dion Green (Miller, Andrea)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Green v. Rogers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Rico Dion Green
Represented By: Andrea Digilio Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: David Rogers
Represented By: Keeley Laine Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?