Wallace v. Thomas et al
| Paul Wallace |
| Ray Thomas and Larry Goff |
| 4:2025cv00577 |
| October 24, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Claire V Eagan |
| Jodi F Jayne |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 JUDGMENT by Judge Claire V Eagan (JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL), dismissing/terminating case (terminates case) (Re: #5 Notice of Dismissal, #9 Order,,,, Ruling on Report and Recommendation, ) (RGG, Chambers) |
Filing 9
ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan - The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. # 7) is accepted, and plaintiff's claims are dismissed with prejudice. A separate judgment of dismissal is entered herewith. ; accepting #7 Report and Recommendation (Re: #7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Magistrate Judge Jodi F Jayne , #5 Notice of Dismissal, 8 Minute Order,, Assigning Case to District Judge,, Changing Case Number, ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
| ***Civil Case Terminated (see document number #10 ) (dla, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , assigning this case to a district judge. Assigning case to District Judge Claire V Eagan and Magistrate Judge Jodi F Jayne, changing case number to 25-cv-577-CVE-JFJ (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (sdc, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Magistrate Judge Jodi F Jayne (Re: 6 Minute Order,, ) (JFJ2, Chambers) |
Filing 6
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jodi F Jayne Plaintiff is ordered to file proof of service for Defendants Ray Thomas and Larry Goff or seek an extension of the service deadline no later than one week from the date of this Order, or by February 6, 2026. If nothing is filed, Plaintiff is warned the case against the remaining Defendant shall be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (JFJ2, Chambers)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Dismissal, dismissing City of Bernice, Jerry Trout, dismissing all claims against City of Bernice and Jerry Trout, (Re: #2 Complaint ) by Paul Wallace (Bryan, John) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , directing Paul Wallace to file a Disclosure Statement pursuant to FRCvP 7.1 and LCvR 7.1-1, if applicable. The parties shall use the form entitled Disclosure Statement available on the Courts website. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (cjb, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF CASE TO A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DECLINATION OF CONSENT FORM. ACTION REQUIRED: This case has been randomly assigned to a United States magistrate judge for all purposes, including trial, final entry of judgment, and direct review by the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. Each party will be deemed to have knowingly and voluntarily consented to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge, if the attached form is not signed and returned within the applicable deadline. The plaintiff or removing party must serve a copy of this notice upon all other parties to this action. (cjb, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against City of Bernice, Larry Goff, Ray Thomas, Jerry Trout (paid $405 filing fee; receipt number AOKNDC-3297589) by Paul Wallace (Bryan, John) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Paul Wallace (Bryan, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.