Barnett v. Sharp
| Christopher J Barnett |
| Tommy Sharp |
| 4:2026cv00313 |
| May 26, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Tulsa Office |
| Gregory K Frizzell |
| Mark T Steele |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 BRIEF in Support of Motion (Re: #20 MOTION to Dismiss as Unexhausted and/or Based on Younger Abstention Doctrine ) by Tommy Sharp ; (With attachments) (Henry, Tessa) |
| Filing 20 MOTION to Dismiss as Unexhausted and/or Based on Younger Abstention Doctrine by Tommy Sharp (Henry, Tessa) |
| Filing 19 Second MOTION to Stay titled as Renewed Motion to Stay by Christopher J Barnett (mm, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 18 MOTION for Extension of Time to Reply to Motion Response (Re: #12 MOTION to Stay ) by Christopher J Barnett (mm, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 17 OBJECTION to Petitioner's Motion to Stay Proceedings and Brief in Support (Re: #12 MOTION to Stay ) by Tommy Sharp (With attachments) (Henry, Tessa) |
| Filing 16 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Tessa L Henry on behalf of Tommy Sharp [Note: Attorney Tessa L Henry added to party Tommy Sharp(pty:res).] (Henry, Tessa) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Change of Address by Christopher J Barnett (atn, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Update Respondent by Christopher J Barnett (atn, Dpty Clk) |
| ***Remark: Emailed docket numbers 1 and 13 to the Office of the Attorney General at [email protected] (Re: #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #13 Order,, Setting/Resetting Deadline(s)/Hearing(s),, Directing Respondent to Show Cause re: PWHC,, Ruling on Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, ) (atn, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 13
ORDER by Judge Gregory K Frizzell ; setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Responses due by 6/30/2026, Replies due by 7/14/2026); directing Respondent to show cause why the writ should not issue and file a response to the petition( Responses due by 7/24/2026, Replies due by 9/8/2026); granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; granting #7 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (Re: #12 MOTION to Stay , #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ) (kjp, Dpty Clk) Modified on 6/11/2026 to add ruling language regarding #7 (cjm, Dpty Clk).
|
| Filing 12 MOTION to Stay by Christopher J Barnett (mm, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , changing case number to 26-cv-00313-GKF-MTS (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (mm, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 10 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from Oklahoma Western |
|
Filing 9
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Signed by Judge Timothy D. DeGiusti on 5/26/2026. (jee) [Transferred from Oklahoma Western on 5/27/2026.]
|
| Filing 8 OBJECTION TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION #5 filed by Christopher J Barnett. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kb) [Transferred from Oklahoma Western on 5/27/2026.] |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Update Respondent by Christopher J Barnett. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kb) [Transferred from Oklahoma Western on 5/27/2026.] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Change of Address by Christopher J Barnett (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kb) [Transferred from Oklahoma Western on 5/27/2026.] |
| Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Christopher J Barnett. The undersigned finds that the interest of justice warrants the transfer of this matter, and recommends that this matter, including Petitioner's pending Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis ECF No. #2 , be transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma. This Report and Recommendation terminates the referral of this matter to the undersigned. All as more fully set out. Objections to R&R due by 5/14/2026. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin on 4/27/2026. (mc) [Transferred from Oklahoma Western on 5/27/2026.] |
| Filing 4 ENTER ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 04/21/2026. (kb) [Transferred from Oklahoma Western on 5/27/2026.] |
| Filing 3 PREVIOUS Cases (kb) [Transferred from Oklahoma Western on 5/27/2026.] |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Christopher J Barnett. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 - Transaction List, #2 Envelope)(kb) [Transferred from Oklahoma Western on 5/27/2026.] |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Christopher J Barnett. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 - First Amendment Violation, #2 Envelope)(kb) [Transferred from Oklahoma Western on 5/27/2026.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Barnett v. Sharp | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Christopher J Barnett | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Tommy Sharp | |
| Represented By: | Tessa L Henry |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
