Thompson et al v. Federal Express Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Victoria C Thompson and Justin Thompson
Defendant: Federal Express Corporation and Arthur G Chavez
Case Number: 4:2026cv00321
Filed: May 29, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: John D Russell
Referring Judge: Mark T Steele
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition to Quiet Title
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 10, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MINUTE ORDER by Judge John D Russell : The Court grants Plaintiffs' request for leave to file an amended complaint, Dkt. #21 at 2-3. Plaintiffs must file their amended complaint by July 24, 2026. If Plaintiffs do not file an amended complaint by that date, the Court will resume consideration of the pending motions to dismiss, setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Miscellaneous Deadline set for 7/24/2026) (Re: #21 Response in Opposition to Motion ) (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (clb, Dpty Clk)
July 2, 2026 Filing 22 REPLY to Response to Motion (Re: #13 Partial MOTION to Dismiss ) by Arthur G Chavez ; (Hancock, Nicholaus)
June 22, 2026 Filing 21 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion (Re: #13 Partial MOTION to Dismiss ) by Justin Thompson, Victoria C Thompson ; (Ingle, J)
June 10, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MINUTE ORDER by Judge John D Russell : Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(2), the Court finds good cause for delay in entering the scheduling order. If necessary, a scheduling order will be entered after ruling on the pending partial motions to dismiss. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (clb, Dpty Clk)
June 9, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MINUTE ORDER by Judge John D Russell : The document filed at Dkt. #10 is hereby stricken. It was filed as a "partial motion to dismiss," but is actually Defendant Arthur G. Chavez's Answer, which was refiled at Dkt. #12 , striking/withdrawing document(s) (Re: #10 Partial MOTION to Dismiss , #12 Answer ) (Documents Terminated: #10 Partial MOTION to Dismiss ) (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (clb, Dpty Clk)
June 8, 2026 Filing 18 Partial MOTION to Dismiss Amended by Federal Express Corporation (Siex, Hunter)
June 5, 2026 Filing 17 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , assigning this case to a district judge. Assigning case to District Judge John D Russell and Magistrate Judge Mark T Steele, changing case number to 26-cv-00321-JDR-MTS (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (cjm, Dpty Clk)
June 5, 2026 Filing 16 JURY DEMAND by Federal Express Corporation (Siex, Hunter)
June 5, 2026 Filing 15 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Arthur G Chavez (Siex, Hunter)
June 5, 2026 Filing 14 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Federal Express Corporation (Siex, Hunter)
June 5, 2026 Filing 13 Partial MOTION to Dismiss by Arthur G Chavez (Siex, Hunter)
June 5, 2026 Filing 12 ANSWER (Re: State Court Petition/Complaint ) by Arthur G Chavez (Siex, Hunter)
June 5, 2026 Filing 11 ANSWER (Re: State Court Petition/Complaint ) by Federal Express Corporation (Siex, Hunter)
June 5, 2026 Filing 10 Partial MOTION to Dismiss by Arthur G Chavez (Siex, Hunter) Modified on 6/10/2026 - STRICKEN per 19 (atn, Dpty Clk).
June 5, 2026 Filing 9 Partial MOTION to Dismiss by Federal Express Corporation (Siex, Hunter)
June 5, 2026 Filing 8 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Hunter Marano Siex on behalf of Arthur G Chavez, Federal Express Corporation (Siex, Hunter)
June 5, 2026 Filing 7 SUPPLEMENT (Re: #2 Notice of Removal ) by Arthur G Chavez, Federal Express Corporation (With attachments) (Hancock, Nicholaus)
June 5, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Mark T Steele Upon review of Defendant's Notice of Removal filed on May 29, 2026 (Docket No. 2), Defendant failed to attach Exhibits 1-6, which appear to include certain documents filed in the state court case. Accordingly, the Court hereby directs Defendant to file Exhibits 1-6 to its Notice of Removal and any other documents required by LCvR 81-2(a) on or before Thursday, June 12, 2026., setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Miscellaneous Deadline set for 6/12/2026) (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (lmt, Dpty Clk)
June 5, 2026 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF CASE TO A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DECLINATION OF CONSENT FORM. ACTION REQUIRED: This case has been randomly assigned to a United States magistrate judge for all purposes, including trial, final entry of judgment, and direct review by the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. Each party will be deemed to have knowingly and voluntarily consented to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge, if the attached form is not signed and returned within the applicable deadline. The plaintiff or removing party must serve a copy of this notice upon all other parties to this action. (mm, Dpty Clk)
June 5, 2026 Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , directing Victoria C Thompson, Justin Thompson, Federal Express Corporation, and Arthur G Chavez to file a Disclosure Statement pursuant to FRCvP 7.1 and LCvR 7.1-1, if applicable. The parties shall use the form entitled Disclosure Statement available on the Courts website. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (mm, Dpty Clk)
May 29, 2026 Filing 3 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Nicholaus Adam Hancock on behalf of Arthur G Chavez, Federal Express Corporation (Hancock, Nicholaus)
May 29, 2026 Filing 2 NOTICE of Removal from Creek County, case number CJ-2026-16 (paid $405 filing fee; receipt number AOKNDC-3402260) by Arthur G Chavez, Federal Express Corporation (Hancock, Nicholaus)
May 29, 2026 Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Arthur G Chavez, Federal Express Corporation (Hancock, Nicholaus)
January 12, 2026 PETITION/COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed in State Court against All Defendants by Victoria C Thompson, Justin Thompson (mm, Dpty Clk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thompson et al v. Federal Express Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Victoria C Thompson
Represented By: J Derek Ingle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Justin Thompson
Represented By: J Derek Ingle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Express Corporation
Represented By: Robert P Coffey, Jr
Represented By: Nicholaus Adam Hancock
Represented By: Hunter Marano Siex
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arthur G Chavez
Represented By: Robert P Coffey, Jr
Represented By: Nicholaus Adam Hancock
Represented By: Hunter Marano Siex
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?