Doe v. Lane et al
Case Number: 5:2006cv00074
Filed: January 23, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Office: Oklahoma City Office
Presiding Judge: Joe Heaton
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 27, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER granting 7 Motion for Protective Order, finding as moot 8 Motion for TRO, to this extend: (1) plaintiff my prosecute this action using a pseudonym, (2) the parties are prohibited from publicly identifying the plaintiff or disclosing identif ying information as to him to any person or entity not directly involved in the prosecution of the case, (3) plaintiff's idenity and any identifying information as to him shall be redacted from all public filings in this case; un-redacted copies of any filing including such information shall be filed under seal, (4) plaintiff is ordered to file under seal, not later than Monday, January 30, 2006, a pleading identifying the plaintiff. Plaintiff's request for preliminary injunction is set for hearing on February 16, 2006, at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom 304. Defendants' response briefs shall be due not later than Monday, February 13, 2006. As more fully set out . Signed by Judge Joe Heaton on 1/27/06. (jw, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doe v. Lane et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?