Beer et al v. XTO Energy Inc
Plaintiff: Ladene Ramsey Beer and Katherine K Boeck
Defendant: XTO Energy Inc
Case Number: 5:2007cv00798
Filed: July 19, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Office: Oklahoma City Office
County: Texas
Presiding Judge: Tim Leonard
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 518 FINAL Order and Judgment Approving Class Action Settlement and Dismissing Action With Prejudice. Signed by Honorable Tim Leonard on 10/12/12. (jy)
March 8, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 405 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 292 Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment for Breach of Contract and Fiduciary Duty. Signed by Honorable Tim Leonard on 03/08/12. (jy)
February 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 357 ORDER denying 298 Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Honorable Tim Leonard on 02/23/12. (jy)
December 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 261 MEMORANDUM OPINION granting 246 Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification, as more fully set forth in the opinion. Plaintiffs' counsel of record are appointed as counsel for the class. Court directs parties to confer and submit to the court within 21 days of the date of this order a notice to be served upon class members. If parties are unable to agree on the text of the notice, they shall jointly file plaintiffs' proposed text interlineated with defendant's objections. East party may also submit a separate brief in support of its position; the brief shall be filed simultaneously with the redlined version of plaintiffs' proposed text and may not exceed 10 pages without leave of court. Signed by Honorable Tim Leonard on 12/16/10. (jy, )
July 13, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 225 ORDER granting 191 Motion to Intervene; granting 195 Motion for Relief from Order of Decertification and Dismissal. Edward White is directed to contact Conner Helms to arrange for prompt delivery to him of all discovery materials provided by def endant during the course of this litigation. In addition, upon receipt of this order, White shall transmit contact information for each member of the class to Helms. Upon receipt of the contact information, Helms is directed to provide a copy of th is order to each member of the class. The style of this case shall be modified to reflect Bill Fankhouser and Tim Goddard as the named plaintiffs. At the hearing on 07/19/10, the parties should be prepared to discuss a scheduling order for the prompt adjudication of this matter, all as more fully set forth in the order. Signed by Honorable Tim Leonard on 07/13/10. (jy, )
March 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 182 ORDER denying 144 plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment as premature. Court orders plaintiffs to show cause why they should not be removed as class representatives and why Martin High and Edward White should not be removed as class counsel. Plaintiffs shall make this showing at a hearing to be held on 04/02/10 at 10:00 am. The Daubert hearing set for 04/02/10 is stricken and this matter is stricken from the court's April 2010 trial docket. Court stays all remaining deadlines in the case except the 03/22/10 deadline for submission of briefs, all as more fully set forth. Signed by Honorable Tim Leonard on 03/16/10. (jy, )
February 5, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 148 ORDER granting 81 Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment for Plaintiffs, Beer and Ramsey with respect to the claims for the representative parties in their individual capacities; court expresses no opinion on the class claims; denying 99 Pl aintiffs' Motion to Strike Defendant's Surreply or, in the Alternative, Plaintiffs' Application for Leave to File a Supplemental Brief in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 105 Defendant's Motion t o Strike Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant's Suggestion of Additional Authority to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgement; denying 105 Defendant's Alternative Motion for Leave to Respond to Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant's Suggestion of Additional Authority to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment, as more fully set forth. Signed by Honorable Tim Leonard on 02/05/10. (jy, )
March 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 75 ORDER granting 27 Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification. Signed by Honorable Tim Leonard on 03/20/09. (jy, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Beer et al v. XTO Energy Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ladene Ramsey Beer
Represented By: Edward L White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Katherine K Boeck
Represented By: Edward L White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: XTO Energy Inc
Represented By: Michael S Peters
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?