Eureka Water Company v. Nestle Waters North America Inc
| Eureka Water Company |
| Nestle Waters North America Inc |
| 5:2007cv00988 |
| September 7, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Oklahoma City Office |
| Oklahoma |
| Timothy D. DeGiusti |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
482
ORDER re 468 plaintiff's Brief-in-Chief in Support of Its Remanded Promissory Estoppel Claim; finding that defendant is entitled to judgment asto plaintiffs promissory estoppel claim (as more fully set out in order). Signed by Honorable Vicki Miles-LaGrange on 6/6/2013. (ks)
|
|
Filing
481
ORDER denying 460 defendant's motion for review of court clerk's order denying defendant's bill of costs (as more fully set out in order). Signed by Honorable Vicki Miles-LaGrange on 5/24/2013. (ks)
|
|
Filing
446
ORDER awarding plaintiff attorney's fees (as more fully set out in the Order). Signed by Honorable Vicki Miles-LaGrange on 9/28/2011. (ks)
|
|
Filing
417
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 357 plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees (as more fully set out in order). Signed by Honorable Vicki Miles-LaGrange on 3/25/2011. (ks)
|
|
Filing
415
ORDER denying 354 plaintiff's motion for an award of prejudgment interest (as more fully set out in Order). Signed by Honorable Vicki Miles-LaGrange on 3/22/2011. (ks)
|
|
Filing
350
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 335 plaintiff's motion for judgment on plaintiff's equitable claims as follows: (1) the Court grants the motion as to plaintiff's request for declaratory judgment, and (2) the Court denies the motion as to plaintiff's unjust enrichment and promissory estoppel/detrimental reliance claims (as more fully set out in the Order). Signed by Honorable Vicki Miles-LaGrange on 8/25/2010. (ks)
|
|
Filing
256
ORDER denying 176 defendant's Motion for Reconsideration (as more fully set out in the Order). Signed by Honorable Vicki Miles-LaGrange on 5/4/2010. (ks)
|
|
Filing
157
ORDER denying 124 plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (as more fully set out in the Order). Signed by Honorable Vicki Miles-LaGrange on 12/21/2009. (ks)
|
|
Filing
118
ORDER denying 88 defendant's Motion to Quash Document and Deposition Subpoenas to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Sam's Club, Inc. (as more fully set out in the Order). Signed by Honorable Vicki Miles-LaGrange on 10/20/2009. (ks)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Eureka Water Company v. Nestle Waters North America Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Eureka Water Company | |
| Represented By: | Robert H Gilliland, Jr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nestle Waters North America Inc | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
