Miskovsky v. Jones
| Grover Lee Miskovsky |
| Justin Jones |
| 5:2008cv00123 |
| February 4, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Oklahoma City Office |
| Alfalfa |
| Joe Heaton |
| Gary M. Purcell |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
220
ORDER ADOPTING FOURTH SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 209 of Magistrate Judge Gary Purcell...defendant Jones' motion to dismiss or in the albernative motion for summary judgment 149 is denied as moot; defendants Rabon and Anderson 9;s motion for summary judgment 179 is granted as to plaintiff's retaliation and conspiracy claims and judgment will be entered in favor of these defendants...as there are no remaining federal claims in this case the court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction to the extent plaintiff alleges claims under Oklahoma law and thos claims will be dismissed without prejudice; plaintiff's motion to strike affidavits in defendants' reply and to sanction defendant's attorney 206 is denied and defendants' motion to strike plaintiff's motion 207 is denied as moot; plaintiff's final motion for sanctions 214 is denied...final judgment will be entered in accordance with this order. Signed by Honorable Joe Heaton on 03/05/2013. (lam)
|
|
Filing
211
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 185 of Magistrate Judge Gary Purcell and denies plaintiff's motion 182 for temporary injunction. Signed by Honorable Joe Heaton on 12/12/2012. (lam)
|
|
Filing
108
ORDER ADOPTING SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 80 ; pla's amended complaint is DISMISSED as to all dfts; dft's motion to dismiss/motion for summary judgment 79 and pla's motion for estoppel or laches 100 are STRICKEN as MOOT; See order for further specifics. Signed by Honorable Joe Heaton on 07/30/2010. (lam)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 49 Report and Recommendation.; striking 59 Motion for Leave to; striking as moot 63 Motion to Strike ; striking as moot 67 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages; striking as moot 67 Motion to Amend/Correct; striking as moot 69 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages; striking as moot 18 Motion to Dismiss; granting 30 Motion to Dismiss, as more fully set out. Signed by Honorable Joe Heaton on 7/24/09. (jw, )
|
|
Filing
49
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION : It is recommended that Dft's 30 AMENDED MOTION to Dismiss be GRANTED. Objections to R&R due by 2/3/2009 This R&R disp of all issues ref to the undersigned Judge in the captioned matter, & any pend mtn not specifically addressed herein is den. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell on 1/14/09. (dm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Miskovsky v. Jones | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Grover Lee Miskovsky | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Justin Jones | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
