Nicholson v. Jones
Petitioner: Reginald Andrew Nicholson
Respondent: Justin Jones
Case Number: 5:2008cv00227
Filed: March 4, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Comanche
Presiding Judge: Stephen P. Friot
Presiding Judge: Bana Roberts
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 25, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER ADOPTING 24 Report and Recommendation, DENYING 28 Motion to Expand the Record filed by Reginald Andrew Nicholson, DENYING 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 5/25/10. (llg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nicholson v. Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Reginald Andrew Nicholson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Justin Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?