Yates v. Astrue
Plaintiff: Jeffery J Yates
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Case Number: 5:2008cv00320
Filed: March 27, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Office: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW Office
County: Stephens
Presiding Judge: Stephen P. Friot
Presiding Judge: Bana Roberts
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER ADOPTING 13 Report and Recommendation, AFFIRMING final decision of Commissioner denying plf's appl for disability insurance benefits & SSI pymts under the SSA. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 1/12/09. (llg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Yates v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeffery J Yates
Represented By: Gregory L Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?