McMahon v. Board of Regents of Oklahoma Agricultural and Mechanical Colleges
Plaintiff: Timothy McMahon
Defendant: Oklahoma Agriculture & Mechanical Colleges Board of Regents
Case Number: 5:2008cv00811
Filed: August 5, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Timothy D. DeGiusti
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 6, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER granting 34 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 5/6/2010. (mb, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McMahon v. Board of Regents of Oklahoma Agricultural and Mechanical Colleges
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Timothy McMahon
Represented By: Stanley M Ward
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Oklahoma Agriculture & Mechanical Colleges Board of Regents
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?