Central National Bank & Trust of Enid v. Aleritas Capital Corporation
Plaintiff: Central National Bank & Trust of Enid
Defendant: Aleritas Capital Corporation
Case Number: 5:2008cv01083
Filed: October 10, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: Garfield
Presiding Judge: Robin J. Cauthron
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER granting 12 13 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Honorable Robin J. Cauthron on 1/26/09. (lg, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Central National Bank & Trust of Enid v. Aleritas Capital Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Central National Bank & Trust of Enid
Represented By: John R Morris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aleritas Capital Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?