Cessna Aircraft Company v. Arinc Incorporated
Cessna Aircraft Company |
Arinc Incorporated |
5:2008cv01141 |
October 27, 2008 |
US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
Contract: Other Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Timothy D. DeGiusti |
Plaintiff |
Diversity |
28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 155 ORDER denying 138 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 143 Motion for Relief Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(f). Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 10/21/2009. (mb, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Cessna Aircraft Company v. Arinc Incorporated | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Cessna Aircraft Company | |
Represented By: | Kathleen J Adler |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Arinc Incorporated | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.