Miller v. Illinois Tool Works Inc et al
| Michael L Miller |
| Illinois Tool Works Inc and Paslode Corporation |
| 5:2009cv00644 |
| June 17, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Oklahoma City Office |
| Stephens |
| Vicki Miles-LaGrange |
| Defendant |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
133
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 95 ITW's Motion in Limine to Exclude the Testimony of Charles Powell as follows: the Court grants the motion as to any testimony by Mr. Powell regarding safety glasses and denies the motion as to any testimony by Mr. Powell regarding his manufacturing defect opinion and his design defect opinion; and granting 110 ITW's Motion in Limine to Exclude Reference to Any Alleged Defect in Charles Powell's Nailer (as more fully set out in the Order). Signed by Honorable Vicki Miles-LaGrange on 6/10/2011. (ks)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER denying 68 defendant Illinois Tool Works Inc.'s motion for summary judgment (as more fully set out in Order). Signed by Honorable Vicki Miles-LaGrange on 3/29/2011. (ks)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER granting 29 defendant Illinois Tool Works, Inc., Paslode Division's Motion for Protective Order (as more fully set out in the Order). Signed by Honorable Vicki Miles-LaGrange on 5/19/2010. (ks)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
