Parr v. Texas Roadhouse Holdings LLC et al
Brittany Ann Parr |
Texas Roadhouse Holdings LLC and V Roman |
5:2009cv01073 |
September 30, 2009 |
US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
Oklahoma City Office |
Oklahoma |
Vicki Miles-LaGrange |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 42 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 36 plaintiff's motion for new trial and combined motion to alter, amend, or vacate a portion of the Court's January 3, 2011 Order as follows: the Court grants the instant motion as to plaintiff 039;s sexual harassment claim and denies as moot the instant motion as to plaintiff's assault and battery claim. The Court vacates its January 3, 2011 Order and Judgment as to plaintiff's sexual harassment claim, and REOPENS this action, and orders that this matter be placed on the next available status and scheduling conference docket (as more fully set out in the Order). Signed by Honorable Vicki Miles-LaGrange on 3/1/2011. (ks) |
Filing 29 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 19 defendant's motion to dismiss as follows: the Court grants defendant's motion to dismiss as to plaintiff's quid pro quo sexual harassment claim, and the Court denies defendant's motion to dismiss as to plaintiff's constructive termination claim (as more fully set out in Order). Signed by Honorable Vicki Miles-LaGrange on 12/7/2010. (ks) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.