Layton et al v. Correctional Healthcare Management of Oklahoma Inc et al
April Layton, Valerie Winfrey and Melanie Hufnagal |
Correctional Healthcare Management of Oklahoma Inc, Oklahoma County Board of County Commissioners and John Whetsel |
5:2009cv01208 |
October 30, 2009 |
US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
Oklahoma City Office |
Oklahoma |
Robin J. Cauthron |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 289 ORDER NUNC PRO TUNC, re 287 Order on Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Honorable Robin J. Cauthron on 2/19/14. (lg) |
Filing 287 ORDER stricken 279 Motion for Taxation of Costs. ; granting 281 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Honorable Robin J. Cauthron on 2/12/14. (lg) |
Filing 164 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 145 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Following Order Vacating the Defendants Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County and John Whetsel. Signed by Honorable Robin J. Cauthron on 10/4/13. (lg) |
Filing 91 ORDER granting 63 Defendants Sheriff John Whetsel, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Oklahoma County, and Defendant Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County Motion for summary Judgment; DENYING 64 Defendant Correctional Healthcare Management of Oklahoma, Inc's Motion for Summary Judgment; GRANTING 71 Motion of Defendant, John Whetsel, Individually for Summary Judgment. Signed by Honorable Robin J. Cauthron on 7/28/11. (lg, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.