Thomas v. Miller et al
| Jerry L Thomas |
| David C Miller and Drew Edmondson |
| 5:2010cv00110 |
| February 3, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Oklahoma City Office |
| Comanche |
| Doyle W. Argo |
| Lee R. West |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 15 . Signed by Honorable Lee R. West on 7/27/2010. (brs, )
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 6 and RE-REFERRING this case to Magistrate Judge Doyle W. Argo. Motions referred to Doyle W. Argo. Signed by Honorable Lee R. West on 3/4/2010. (brs, )
|
|
Filing
6
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION the undersigned finds that Petitioner has sufficient funds to prepay the filing fee of $5. Specifically, the record reflects that Petitioner has $23.00 in his inmate savings account which is available for the payme nt of filing fees. Because Petitioner does not qualify for authorization to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee, it is recommended that Petitioners motion [Doc. No. 2] be denied and that he be ordered to prepay the full $5 filing fee for this action to proceed. re 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Jerry L Thomas Objections to R&R due by 2/25/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Doyle W. Argo on 2/5/2010. (sr, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
