Davis v. Goforth et al
| Maurice Delane Davis |
| Tom Goforth, Carlos Miar, Joel Alexandre, Paul Nordsturm, Dr. Hernandez, P. A. Esquitini and Director Laplin |
| 5:2010cv00958 |
| September 3, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Oklahoma City Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Stephen P. Friot |
| Bana Roberts |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 24 Report and Recommendation.. See order as more fully set out. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 12/21/2010. (kr, )
|
|
Filing
24
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 5 Complaint filed by Maurice Delane Davis. It is recommended that Plaintiffs Bivens complaint be dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 67; 1915(e)(2) and 1915A(b)(1). It is further recommended that the paper labeled as a Writ of Mandamus/or and Otherwise Motion to Execute Sentence in the Plight of a Binding Liberty Interest and appended to the complaint be sticken and that Plaintiff be advised that if he wishes to pursue a claim based on the allegations in the paper, he must do so through a separate action. Objections to R&R due by 12/20/2010. This Report and Recommendation disposes of all issues referred to the undersignedMagistrate Judge in the captioned matter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bana Roberts on 11/30/10. (jw, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
