Fulton v. Astrue
Plaintiff: Scotty D Fulton
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Case Number: 5:2010cv01389
Filed: December 27, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Office: Oklahoma City Office
County: Kiowa
Presiding Judge: Valerie K. Couch
Presiding Judge: Joe Heaton
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of Magistrate Judge Couch's Report and Recommendation Doc 16 and the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this decision. Signed by Honorable Joe Heaton on 12/15/11. (pw, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fulton v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Scotty D Fulton
Represented By: Mark E Buchner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Represented By: James D Sides
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?